Radionics & Modern Science
This, at first sight, looks like any other radionic instrument, but it has been designed on a modular basis, so that any number of units can be linked together. Its versatility is invaluable since a practitioner is no longer limited to ONE instrument in ONE cabinet. He can choose what units he may need for his own particular requirements. These could include items for work on colour, sound computers, etc.
In my own case, the centre portion is the basic unit for diagnosis. The meter registers a ‘balance’ between the radionic impulse set on the diagnostic unit and the ten position treatment unit on the right of thepicture. The lower socket connects with the ‘stick-pad’ unit which can be adjusted to the sensitivity of a particular operator. This pad can, moreover, be used as the focal point when working with a pendulum.
The left hand panel gives a Sine-Wave pulse as an addition to the normal radionic wave. This can either be set for continual pulse or be switched to a pre-set timer.
At this point it would be legitimate to ask whether such an instrument has any advantages over others. I cannot describe its working in absolute detail here, but two factors are of key importance.
Firstly, there is the ability to measure more accurately than has ever been possible and Mike Roberts makes this need clear in his article ‘Observations and Experiments in Radionic and allied fields’ published in the Radionic Journal of September 1980, under the heading ‘Base Ten Dials’ from which I quote:
“In the course of developing a portable diagnostic and treatment instrument two conditions were laid down as being of prime importance. The first was that it should be possible to accurately set any number required round the dials, and to be able to accurately reset that number on any subsequent occasion. It is possible, unless great care is taken, to go slightly over or under the desired number. For example, suppose the ‘rate’ 596 is being put on a standard 9 dial instrument, it could be set at 5 and a bit over, 9 and a bit under, and 6 more or less. The next time the ‘rate’ is set up it could be 5 and a bit under, 9 and a bit over, and so on. This problem was solved by using click-stick positions at each numerical setting. In this way each number clicks into position as it is approached and is very easily re-set to its exact position on any subsequent occasion.”
This method is incorporated in my new instrument. In addition, I use three dials for measuring, instead of one, as has been the practice in the past. These are to be seen in the centre of the picture. The right dial is for units, the centre for tens and the left for hundreds.
Using the Drown technique all glands and organs should register at 80—100 normal. One begins measuring on the tens dial and the impulse registers, say, 40. One then continues on the units dial, and if this registers at 6, the full reading is 46. It cannot be 45 nor 47. Thus more accurate information is obtained. Having worked out our information on a practical basis, one must then consider the possibility of storing this in a computer. So we turn our minds to the concept of ‘Computerised Radionics’ as a workable premise.
One major problem, however, lies in tying up the pendulum or ‘stick-pad’ response to a computer. It is unscientific to wave a pendulum, or to stroke a rubber or wooden pad in order to register the impulse. But here I think a big step forward could be taken in terms of ‘brain-wave’ patterns, which are known to produce signals and might indicate pendulum response.
In the beginning it was thought one would have to measure the brain-wave directly, but that would mean having an electrode on or round the temple of a practitioner. This is obviously impracticable and a device less clumsy is under consideration. One way is to have a plate or pad on which a practitioner could place his hand and which would detect the electrical signals from the brain. These signals a computer would then interpret in the same way as a practitioner now interprets the automatic movements of a pendulum suspended from his hand.
This I feel is the most modern and dynamic area so far as the overall progress of Radionics is concerned. However, a word of caution … although some experimental trials have already been made, it is likely to be some time before satisfactory conclusions can be put on record, and information on the subject made public.
A further point under consideration is the ‘time factor’ in radionics. In a large practice much time is consumed by dials having to be set manually on instruments periodically. Here there is room for saving by the introduction of Radionics and the Computer. The ultimate method could be to have a simple computer that would allow all information relative to radionic procedures to be incorporated in it, with a display panel similar to those used in everyday commerce. This would instantly display all possible treatments applicable to any diseased condition.
With such a system a Practitioner would have at his elbow a simple and quick reference infinitely superior to having to search through his notebooks, card indexes and treatment lists. Such a computer could also retain a wide range of information gleaned over the years from his own practice as well as those of colleagues.
The possibilities grow — for instance, a more advanced form of radionic computer would be able to store all the information contained within the ‘rate book’, and this would be instantly accessable to the practitioner. A computer with more memory capacity could contain everything in a patient’s file so that if a new analysis and treatment was needed at any time, the relevant information would be there. In fact the total amount of information stored in a computer is limited only by its memory capabilities, and it is at this point that the vexed question of cost to the practitioner would have to be considered.