<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Borderlands - The Crossroads of Science &#38; Spirit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://borderlandresearch.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://borderlandresearch.com</link>
	<description>Seeing beyond the borders of perception!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Eeman&#8217;s Healing BioCircuits</title>
		<link>http://borderlandresearch.com/eemans-healing-biocircuits?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=eemans-healing-biocircuits</link>
		<comments>http://borderlandresearch.com/eemans-healing-biocircuits#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 07:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bio-energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borderlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radionics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocircuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eeman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderlandresearch.com/?p=2368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Co-Operative Healing with Eeman Circuits THE CENTRAL THEME OF EEMAN&#8217;S WORK This term refers to therapeutic effects obtained by applying wire circuits to connect one part of a person&#8217;s body with, another part, or to connect an area of one person&#8217;s body with an area of another person&#8217;s body. L. E. Eeman, in his exhaustive research into this type of circuit as detailed in his book Co-Operative Healing, utilized these connections in pairs so that there would be a complete &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://borderlandresearch.com/eemans-healing-biocircuits">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button" share_url="http://borderlandresearch.com/eemans-healing-biocircuits"></a></div><h2>Co-Operative Healing with Eeman Circuits</h2>
<h3>THE CENTRAL THEME OF EEMAN&#8217;S WORK</h3>
<p>This term refers to therapeutic effects obtained by applying wire circuits to connect one part of a person&#8217;s body with, another part, or to connect an area of one person&#8217;s body with an area of another person&#8217;s body. L. E. <strong>Eeman</strong>, in his exhaustive research into this type of circuit as detailed in his book <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Co-Operative Healing</span>, utilized these connections in pairs so that there would be a complete electrical circuit.</p>
<p>The basis of the flow effects obtained by the use of these <em>Eeman</em> circuits, was the discovery that human bodies give evidence of being bi-polar, along three axes—</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Head to feet<br />
Right side to left side<br />
Back to front</p>
<p>When polar opposites are connected together, whether within one body or between two or more bodies, the effects noted include greater relaxation, recovery from fatigue and disease, greater capacity for work, better health in general. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Eeman</span> circuits connecting polar opposites are termed &#8220;Relaxation Circuits&#8221;.</p>
<p>When polar similars are connected together, the effects noted are the creation of tension, and the opposites of all the advantages obtained from Relaxation Circuits. Eeman circuits connecting polar similars are termed &#8220;Tension Circuits&#8221;.</p>
<p>The use of these Eeman circuits have been found to affect not only functional physical and mental conditions but also organic conditions.</p>
<p>In people born right-handed, the head and right side have been found to have the same polarity, which by convention has been termed positive. In these individuals, the base of the spine, and the left hand share the same polarity, opposite to that of the head and right side, and is therefore termed negative. Generally polarities are considered reversed in those born left-handed, however Eeman found that some left-handers were of the same polarity as right-handers.</p>
<p>Eeman and co-workers performed thousands of carefully documented experiments under controlled conditions over a period of years, establishing the effects of a wide variety of these circuits, and ruling out the possibility of effects through suggestion or other extraneous influences. For more detail, see his book Co-Operative Healing, published in London, 1947 by Frederick MuIIer, Ltd.</p>
<h3>ONE PERSON IN AN EEMAN CIRCUIT</h3>
<p><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/?attachment_id=2372" rel="attachment wp-att-2372"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2372" title="Eeman Relaxation Circuit - Cooperative Healing" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/cooperative-eeman-1.jpg" alt="Eeman Relaxation Circuit - Cooperative Healing" width="454" height="532" /></a>The diagram (Fig. 1) shows the circuit. Two metal handles each connect through approximately 10 ft. of insulated copper wire, to copper screen mats about a foot square. The individual lies on his back with the copper mats under his head and base of spine. For right-handed individuals, a relaxation circuit is formed if the left hand holds the handle connecting to the mat under the head, and the right hand holds the handle connected with the mat under the bottom of spine. Average duration of exposure is half an hour.</p>
<p>Likewise for right-handed individuals, if the handles are switched so that the left hand holds the handle connecting to the mat under the bottom of the spine, and the right hand holds the handle connecting to the mat under the head, a tension circuit is formed. These effects are noted even if the individual is not aware of the specific connections or if the connections are changed out of range of his vision and without his knowledge. One of the reasons for 10-ft. length of connection wires, is to permit changes of connection without the subject&#8217;s knowledge, in order to test the effect of suggestion. In almost all instances, the reactions are those appropriate to the circuit rather than to the suggestion given, if the suggestion is contrary to the effect of the circuit.</p>
<p>Many case reports covering various types of ailments are detailed in Eeman&#8217;s book <span style="text-decoration: underline;"> Co-Operative Healing</span>, and will not be repeated here. Among the ailments relieved by these circuits are listed: mental, nervous, circulatory, respiratory, digestive and eliminative disorders; headaches, high blood-pressure, rheumatism, lumbago, sciatica and many other conditions. Insomnia appeared particularly to be relieved.</p>
<p>Eeman states:</p>
<p>&#8220;The relaxation circuit almost invariably produces a progressive sense of muscular relaxation, warmth, well-being and drowsiness, often culminating in sleep, slower and stronger pulse, slower and fuller respiration, with more complete deflation, progressively longer pauses between deflations and inflations, and a lowering of the pitch of the voice.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Tension circuit reverses the above reactions and eventually leads to varying degrees of tension, restlessness and discomfort.</p>
<p>It was found that direct contact between the copper mats and the individual was not necessary in order to produce the effects noted; clothing and even cushions did not act as barriers.</p>
<h3>TWO PERSONS IN AN EEMAN CIRCUIT</h3>
<p>The effects of both Relaxation and Tension Eeman circuits are usually increased if two persons are connected with each other, using a separate pair of copper mats for each person.</p>
<p>The normal Relaxation circuit is formed when the head of each person is connected to the left hand of the other person, and the bottom of the spine of each person is connected to the right hand of the other person. See Fig. 2.</p>
<p>It was found that sex made no difference in polarity—the same circuit being applicable to two men, two women, or one woman and one man. However, Left and Right-handedness does make a difference in polarity. When a right-handed person is placed in circuit with a left-handed person, then the Relaxation circuit is formed when the head of each person connects with the right hand of the other person, and the bottom of spine of each person connects with the left hand of the other person. Also, the left-handed person should lie in the opposite direction from the right-handed one.</p>
<p>Reports from the experiments indicate the rather curious fact that when a strong or well person is placed in an Eeman circuit with a weak or ill person, both experience beneficial effects from the experience. Sleep for a half hour or more will frequently visit both subjects.</p>
<p>Another interesting fact that emerged from the tests, is that a Tension circuit tends to produce discord and antagonism between the two participating subjects, and this antagonism is then dissipated if a Relaxation circuit is used.</p>
<h3><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/?attachment_id=2384" rel="attachment wp-att-2384"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2384" title="Two Person Eeman Cooperative Circuit" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/cooperative-eeman-2.jpg" alt="Two Person Eeman Cooperative Circuit" width="567" height="493" /></a>THREE OR MORE PERSONS IN AN EEMAN CIRCUIT</h3>
<p>The same principles were found to apply with three or more persons in circuit —in fact the number of persons could be increased indefinitely. However, with the addition of more individuals in the circuit, additional phenomena appeared; some individuals turned out to be stronger &#8220;emitters&#8221;, other individuals acted more as &#8220;receivers&#8221;, while others seemed to have as the primary characteristic, that of being &#8220;conductors&#8221;. For a detailed account of these characteristics, refer to Eeman&#8217;s book Co-Operative Healing, Chapter IV,</p>
<p>Fig. 3 shows a Relaxation circuit between three individuals; the same circuit can be expanded to include any desired number. This is termed a &#8220;series&#8221; type of circuit.</p>
<p><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/?attachment_id=2391" rel="attachment wp-att-2391"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-2391" title="3 Person Eeman Cooperative Circuit" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/cooperative-eeman-3.jpg" alt="3 Person Eeman Cooperative Circuit" width="631" height="401" /></a>For multiple use (three or more persons in circuit at one time), two principal circuits emerged as the best ones to use—diagrammed in Figs. 4, 5 and 6.</p>
<p>In Fig. 4, all the heads connect together, all spines connect together, and those then are connected with each other. All right hands connect together, all left hands connect together, and those two sets are likewise connected with each other.<a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/?attachment_id=2392" rel="attachment wp-att-2392"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-2392" title="4 Person Cooperative Eeman Circuit" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/cooperative-eeman-4.jpg" alt="4 Person Cooperative Eeman Circuit" width="666" height="382" /></a>In Fig. 5, all heads and all left hands connect together, and all spines and all right hands connect together.</p>
<h3><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/?attachment_id=2396" rel="attachment wp-att-2396"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-2396" title="4 Person Eeman Cooperative Circuit" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/cooperative-eeman-5.jpg" alt="4 Person Eeman Cooperative Circuit" width="598" height="397" /></a>CONCLUSIONS ON THE EEMAN CIRCUITS</h3>
<p>It would appear from the Eeman experiments, that human beings emit, emanate or radiate a particular kind of current or impulse, which can be channelled with wire connections and used to produce either healing effects or adverse effects, depending upon polarity.</p>
<h3>DRUG TESTS WITH EEMAN CIRCUITS</h3>
<p>One of the most interesting aspects of the Eeman research, was the series of tests in which a Relaxation Eeman circuit was established for one or several persons, and the circuit was broken by test vials placed in the circuit one at a time, each vial containing two electrodes immersed in a drag or medicinal solution. The vials were inserted out of range of the vision of the subjects, and they did not at any time have any knowledge of the names or characteristics of the test substances. Yet within a short time after a substance had been inserted, the subjects experienced physiological changes and symptoms, which almost always were representative of the effects engendered by the drug or substance used in the test. If the subjects were kept in circuit with a substance for too long a time, there were instances where the symptoms or physiological effects became very acute and severe.</p>
<p>Some of the tests were run with coded vials, so that the operator would not know what substance was in use at any given time, and so could not have had telepathic influence over the minds of the subjects. These tests, conducted to rule out the possibility of telepathic effect, proved just as positive in results as the tests conducted when the operator (though not the subjects) knew what substances were being tested.</p>
<p>Fig. 6 shows an Eeman Relaxation circuit for drug tests.</p>
<p><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/?attachment_id=2397" rel="attachment wp-att-2397"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-2397" title="Eeman Circuit Drug Test" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/cooperative-eeman-6.jpg" alt="Eeman Circuit Drug Test" width="605" height="376" /></a>The implications of these Eeman Circuit drug tests tend to confirm the hypothesis, previously stated by others, that all substances radiate and that these radiations can be carried on wires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borderlandresearch.com/eemans-healing-biocircuits/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giant Veil of &#8220;Cold Plasma&#8221; Discovered High Above Earth</title>
		<link>http://borderlandresearch.com/giant-veil-of-cold-plasma-discovered-high-above-earth?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=giant-veil-of-cold-plasma-discovered-high-above-earth</link>
		<comments>http://borderlandresearch.com/giant-veil-of-cold-plasma-discovered-high-above-earth#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cosmos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold Plasma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA Cluster II Spacecraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar flare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderlandresearch.com/?p=2302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clouds of charged &#8220;cold plasma&#8221; particles reach from the top of Earth&#8217;s atmosphere to at least a quarter the distance to the moon, according to new data from a cluster of European satellites. Earth generates cold plasma—slow-moving charged particles—at the edge of space, where sunlight strips electrons from gas atoms, leaving only their positively charged cores, or nuclei. Researchers had suspected these hard-to-detect particles might influence incoming space weather, such as this week&#8217;s solar flare {January 22, 2012] and resulting &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://borderlandresearch.com/giant-veil-of-cold-plasma-discovered-high-above-earth">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button" share_url="http://borderlandresearch.com/giant-veil-of-cold-plasma-discovered-high-above-earth"></a></div><h2>Clouds of charged &#8220;cold plasma&#8221; particles reach from the top of Earth&#8217;s atmosphere to at least a quarter the distance to the moon, according to new data from a cluster of European satellites.</h2>
<p>Earth generates cold plasma—slow-moving charged particles—at the edge of space, where sunlight strips electrons from gas atoms, leaving only their positively charged cores, or nuclei.</p>
<p>Researchers had suspected these hard-to-detect particles might influence incoming space weather, such as this week&#8217;s solar flare {January 22, 2012] and resulting geomagnetic storm. That&#8217;s because solar storms barrage Earth with similar but high-speed charged particles.</p>
<p>Still, no one could be certain what the effects of cold plasma might be without a handle on its true abundance around our planet.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s like the weather forecast on TV. It&#8217;s very complicated to make a reasonable forecast without the basic variables,&#8221; said space scientist Mats André, of the <a href="http://www.space.irfu.se/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Swedish Institute of Space Physics</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Discovering this cold plasma is like saying, Oh gosh, there are oceans here that affect our weather,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p><strong>The Trick to Finding Cold Plasma</strong></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/giant-veil-of-cold-plasma-discovered-high-above-earth/image_thumb-png-5" rel="attachment wp-att-2301"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-2301" title="ESA's Cluster II spacecraft in orbit.  " src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/image_thumb1-150x150.png" alt="ESA's Cluster II spacecraft in orbit. " width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">An artist&#39;s rendering of ESA&#39;s Cluster II spacecraft in orbit.</p></div>
<p>Researchers already knew that some cold plasma existed in the ionosphere, about 60 miles (100 kilometers) above Earth&#8217;s surface. But few researchers had looked for the clouds between 12,400 and 60,000 miles (20,000 and 100,000 kilometers) high.</p>
<p>André and his colleague Chris Cully suspected the plasma could be out there, but they knew the positive charge of spacecraft wasn&#8217;t helping any search efforts.</p>
<p>Similar to the way cold plasma is created, sunlight strips electrons from spacecraft materials, making their hulls positively charged. Like two matching magnetic poles, a spacecraft would simply repulse any cold plasma around it.</p>
<p>To find the stuff, André and Cully instead analyzed anomalies in data from the European Space Agency&#8217;s Cluster II spacecraft.</p>
<p>This group of four satellites swings around Earth in a highly elliptical orbit. At the orbit&#8217;s peak, the probes reach nearly halfway to the moon.</p>
<p>The enormous distance gives researchers a chance to sweep through and monitor Earth&#8217;s magnetic field and electrical activity, including the influence of &#8220;hot&#8221; charged particles emitted by <a href="http://science.nationalgeographic.com/science/space/solar-system/sun-article/" rel="nofollow">the sun</a>.</p>
<p>Anomalies in the Cluster II data turned out to be shockwaves from cold plasma particles moving around the satellites.</p>
<p><strong>Cold Plasma a Space Weather &#8220;Elephant&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>In the end, the pair found that cold plasma makes up between 50 and 70 percent of all charged particles within the farther reaches of Earth&#8217;s magnetic field.</p>
<p>André says it&#8217;s now time to start updating space-weather models to take the extra cold plasma into account—at this point, for instance, nothing is known about how the plasma might affect solar storms.</p>
<p>This influence is &#8220;not a minor thing in space weather,&#8221; André said. &#8220;It&#8217;s an elephant in the room.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>The cold-plasma study has been accepted for publication in</em> <a href="http://www.agu.org/journals/gl/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Geophysical Research Letters</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">by Dave Mosher</a></p>
<p>Published January 26, 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borderlandresearch.com/giant-veil-of-cold-plasma-discovered-high-above-earth/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Theory of Anti-Relativity</title>
		<link>http://borderlandresearch.com/the-theory-of-anti-relativity?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-theory-of-anti-relativity</link>
		<comments>http://borderlandresearch.com/the-theory-of-anti-relativity#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aether]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dielectricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dollard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderlandresearch.com/?p=2259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by E.P. Dollard Back to Space, or Why One Over The Speed of Light Squared: In order to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the dimensional relations of the magnetic inductance, and the electro-static capacitance it is necessary to turn again to the metrical dimension of space. It is, however, this dimension of space has become warped, as expressed in a N.F.G. It is in what follows found that the Faraday understanding is in direct conflict with the Einstein understanding, &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://borderlandresearch.com/the-theory-of-anti-relativity">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button" share_url="http://borderlandresearch.com/the-theory-of-anti-relativity"></a></div><h3>by E.P. Dollard</h3>
<h2>Back to Space, or Why One Over The Speed of Light Squared:</h2>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 301px"><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/?attachment_id=2257" rel="attachment wp-att-2257"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2257" title="Eric Dollard Tesla Plasma " src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/TeslaPlasma-CIG-organic3-291x300.jpg" alt="Eric Dollard Tesla Plasma " width="291" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Eric Dollard Tesla Plasma</p></div>
<p>In order to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the dimensional relations of the magnetic inductance, and the electro-static capacitance it is necessary to turn again to the metrical dimension of space. It is, however, this dimension of space has become warped, as expressed in a N.F.G. It is in what follows found that the Faraday understanding is in direct conflict with the Einstein understanding, the latter extinguishing the former. Lines of induction have given way to relativistic concepts, fact has succumbed to phantasy. This condition has a direct influence upon the conceptual understanding of the conditions and dimensions that give rise to electrical inductivity as expressed by the co-efficients of magnetic and dielectric fields known as “the inductance” and “the capacitance”.</p>
<p>The concept of space, as given by Albert Einstein, constitutes a serious impediment to the understanding of this metrical dimension. The salient constituent of the Einstein “Theory of <i>Relativity</i>” is the Minkowski “Four-Space”. To quote Einstein “With out it the General Theory of <u>Relativity</u>, etc., would of perhaps got no farther than its long cloths,” “Relativity” by Albert Einstein, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey. Minkowski proposed a fourth co-ordinate be compounded upon the three co-ordinate (cubic) set of Descartes, “Cartesian” third order space. Einstein here accordingly represents this fourth order space in “Gaussian” rather that “Cartesian” co-ordinates.</p>
<p>The fourth co-ordinate, or length, of space is derived as</p>
<p>(1) Velocity – Time</p>
<p>Since it is dimensionally</p>
<p>(2) Velocity, or Space per Time</p>
<p>Substituting (2) into (1) gives</p>
<p>(3) Space – Time per Time or Space – Numeric</p>
<p>Here derived is a fictitious space co-ordinate, a length, this given as a light second. Hence</p>
<p>(4) Centimeter – Second per Second, or Centimeter</p>
<p>And</p>
<p>(5) Second per Second, or Numeric</p>
<p>Minkowski affixes a versor operator, the square root of negative one, to this numeric. It has been shown that this versor can possess two distinct values, and hence two distinct versor positions in time. Taking the light second as ct, where c is the luminal velocity, and t is the time period, the versor gives the pair</p>
<p>(A) Positive jct, Light – Seconds</p>
<p>(B) Negative jct, Light – Seconds</p>
<p>This quadrature form implies four distinct time frames, however, Einstein ignores the versor positions, retaining only one, jct. Einstein – Minkowski represents this as an ill-conceived space versor.</p>
<p>Einstein remarks here “Time is robbed of its independence”. Now time is married to the velocity of light. Minkowski goes on to say, “Hence forth space by itself and time by itself are doomed”. All are relative to the velocity of light. This is “The Theory of Relativity.”</p>
<p>Here any development of a mathematics of space comes to a standstill. Space now is just a factor of the velocity of light. It is instructive to reflect here upon the history of one over the speed of light square. The dimensional relation is,</p>
<p>(6) Constant, or Second Square per Centimeter Square</p>
<p>One over c square finds an origin in the work of James Clerk Maxwell, 1831 to 1879. Maxwell was a Scottish born natural philosopher. His work follows the trail of Ben Franklin and Michael Faraday, thru the mathematics of Newton – Liebnitz. Here arose the “Faraday – Maxwell” theory of electricity, the foundation of electrical understanding. But does anyone understand it? I think not.</p>
<p>Maxwell, in his studies, had determined the existence of a distinct factor of proportionality, this factor expressing a ratio of mechanical force exerted upon physical matter thru dielectric actions, to mechanical force exerted upon physical matter thru magnetic actions. This of course relates directly to our principle question at hand for the quantum mechanics; the condition of equal and opposite forces between dielectricity and magnetism. No answer yet.</p>
<p>It may be noted that Maxwell’s determination of this “proportionality factor” gave rise to a NUMERIC value of one over c square. It is a faulty inference to assume this factor is an actual velocity, or is the dimensional relation of a velocity at all. Here given it is numeric. In the comparisons of optics and electrodynamics it is found that a dielectric has the following characteristics;</p>
<blockquote><p>(1) Refractive Index</p>
<p>(2) Dielectric Inductivity</p>
<p>(3) Luminal Velocity</p></blockquote>
<p>All three of these relations are exactly related to the velocity of light. But here again is one over c square and actual velocity?</p>
<p>Maxwell’s discovery of a factor of proportionality between dielectricity and magnetism led to his theory of conjugate pair of inductions, dielectric and magnetic, in union, propagating at the velocity of light thru the “Luminiferous Aether”. Hence, electro-magnetic waves in free space, unbounded by gross physical matter, mass free energy. This propagation is within the dielectric, or aetheric, medium itself. It is free of so-called “charge carriers” (electrons), a mass-less form of electricity. This concept had a very powerful impact upon the scientific and philosophical thoughts of Maxwell’s era. So here begins the notion of “wireless”, the transmission of electricity without wires or other guiding structures.</p>
<p>Leading up to the work of Heinrich Hertz, 1857 to 1894, the wireless transmission of electricity had found experimental verification by Joseph Henry, and Elihu Thompson. It even was patented by M. Loomis. See “Secrets of Cold War Technology” by Jerry Vasillatos. These examples however were no electro-magnetic, they were electro-static (dielectric). Heinrich Hertz provided the first complete laboratory demonstration of the transmission of electricity thru “free space”, (across the room). This was instantly considered proof of the Maxwell theory of electro-magnetism, and electro-magnetic waves. When Nikola Tesla engaged in the experiments of Hertz, he found these waves not to be completely electro-magnetic. The early death of Hertz prevented any further progress. However “the world view” kept hold of its belief that “Hertzian” waves are only transverse E. M. waves, the two distinctions now synonymous.</p>
<p>When Nikola Tesla undertook the development of his unique transmission transformers, he soon found the velocity of light had no relation here. In his “Colorado Springs Notes” experiment and calculation demonstrate that the propagation on his “extra coil” tends toward 180 percent luminal velocity. See “Theory of Wireless Power”, by E. P. Dollard. It is found that the extra coil propagation is not even in the dimension of velocity at all. See “Transmission and Reception of Telluric Electric Waves”, by E. P. Dollard. The one over c square is not applicable to the efforts of Nikola Tesla. Tesla is not equal to one over c square.</p>
<p>In the writings of J. J. Thompson it is found he considered dielectric propagation and magnetic propagation can be independent. Also considered is that the magnetism is a secondary response to dielectric forces. This is also found in the writings of C. P. Steinmentz, “Transients in Space”, page 394 to 419, from “Theory and Calculation of Transient Electric Phenomena”. Here considered is a “Hysteresis of the Aether”, given as an alternative to the concept of electromagnetic radiation. In this chapter the velocity of the dielectric induction and the velocity of magnetic induction are given as independent variables. The factor one over c squared is here only a dimensional transform between inductance and capacitance. See The International Tesla Society lecture on the “Hysteresis of the Aether” by E. P. Dollard. Here again one over c squared is only a proportionality factor, not a velocity.</p>
<p>Finally, it has been disclosed by insiders within the space program, N.A.S.A., of a “certain complication”. It was found that when far outside the Earth’s field of influence the stars and sun are NOT VISIBLE! However, the Earth and the Moon are plainly visible. No direct light in outer space, only that made visible by gross physical matter. This gives rise to an important question, does the “light” from the sun propagate with a velocity at all, or is it simply a function of time. The “time delay” may be no more than a hysteresis of the luminiferous aether.</p>
<p>It should be noted it is only by the time delay that we can consider velocity in many situations. Otherwise also needed is the wavelength. Is it the primary luminal induction, say from the Sun, a hysteresis in order to engender visible light on Earth? Now we are dug in deep!</p>
<p>So, what meaning do we attribute to one over c square? It is a velocity, an index, a ratio, a proportionality factor, and even a constituent of the Farad. It is in everything, and now we hang Einstein’s Theory of Relativity on top of it all. Such is one over c square.</p>
<p>In order to make a determination on this matter of one over c square it is instructive to enter the One Wing Parrot itself. We will take the position of Dorthey, who must conquer the Wicked Witch of the West, (WWW). Now she must stand, with her poodle and some unlikely friends from Lone Pine, before the great Wizard of Oz. Dorthey simply wants to go back to Kansas, and so do we. Here we must meet face to face with Einstein and the Theory of Relativity. In order to become better acquainted with the development of Relativity refer to E. Whittaker, “History of the Theories of the Aether”. Here follows only the salient features of Relativity as expressed by Albert Einstein. The primary purpose here is how Relativity relates to Electrical Engineering thru the concepts of Inductance and Capacitance.</p>
<p>Einstein’s theory finds its seed in a certain speed of light dilemma and the related experiments of Fitzeau involving moving liquid dielectrics (10-C Oil). Consider a pair of red lasers in a setup like the cubic experiments given earlier. Two red lasers, side by side, distant from each other, again are utilized. Each individual beam is received by its own individual target. Here the measurements are made. One laser is stationary, the other laser is moving towards its target at 50 percent luminal velocity, c. It is of course found that the beam sent by the stationary laser arrives at its target with a lag in time (hysteresis) that co-responds to the delay involved in luminal propagation thru the span between the laser and its target. The moving laser beam also arrives at its target with a lag in time, but not that of 150 percent luminal velocity as given by the superposition of velocities. It arrives with the same delay as that due to luminal velocity thru the span between the laser and its target. Hence the law of superposition is now not applicable to luminal velocity, no matter what the velocity of the moving laser, the velocity of the beam is always c. This situation provides the cornerstone upon which lay the Einstein concept of Relativity.</p>
<p>It is however that Einstein may have left out a few details. The stationary laser puts a red spot on its target. It is a red laser, just like the moving laser. They are both red, big deal. But wait Mr. Wizard, Look! Look! The spot on the moving laser’s target is GREEN!</p>
<p><strong>The Theory of Relativity, or Why One Over C Squared:</strong></p>
<p>So, how are you going to explain to the cops that the light was green when it is in reality red? Will you tell them “its all relative”? They say “you were going too fast.” The light looks green because of the “Doppler Effect”. This is a situation where the wavelength of light shortens and the frequency increases, maintaining a constant velocity. The moving laser is traveling with a velocity 50 percent that of light, the wavelength shortens by the square root of 50 percent, the frequency increases by the square root of 50 percent. Hence red light is forced to become green light. The speed of this light is still luminal velocity, c.</p>
<p>The dimensional relation is given by</p>
<p>(1) Velocity, or Length – Frequency</p>
<p>This velocity is a constant or invariant. Any variation in condition is factored into, the length of the wave, and the cyclic rate of the frequency, each in a complimentary manner so as to maintain a constant velocity. Here given is,</p>
<p>(2) Space, or Length in Centimeters,</p>
<p>(3) Time, or Per Frequency, in Seconds,</p>
<p>(4) Velocity, or Space Per Time, in Centimeter Per Second.</p>
<p>Thus the Doppler Effect shortens the wave length, and also shortens the time period, as given by the frequency. Because luminal velocity is the ratio of length to time, and both length and time both shorten in exact proportion to each other, the change cancels and the velocity remains a constant. In other words if the transmitting laser is in motion at a percent velocity of light, being 100 at luminal velocity, it is the length contracts by the square root of this percentage of luminal velocity, and the time period contracts by the square root of this percentage of luminal velocity. And obviously the product of a pair of square roots is the square of the square root, or the percentage of luminal velocity.</p>
<p>The basic dimensional relation</p>
<p>(5) Length times Frequency Equals the constant</p>
<p>Lambda times F gives c. This is a most fundamental law of radio engineering, where the constant c is 300 mega-cycle – meters per second.</p>
<p>Relativity results from the following situation. Riding with the laser, it moving 50 percent luminal velocity, you see it as red. It has a red wavelength and a red frequency. The stationary observer sees it as green. It is a green wavelength and a green frequency. Relative to the stationary observer, you riding the moving laser see length as longer, (red vs. green), and time as slower, (red vs. green) Einstein’s Relativity tells us the stationary observer sees length as shorter, (green vs. red) and time as faster relative to the motional observer, (green vs. red). Experiment shows that the light beam changes in its dimensional relations, Einstein says the motional observer changes in it’s dimensional relations. What can we make of this discrepancy?</p>
<p>The velocity at which light propagates, the luminal velocity, c, is a property of the dielectric itself, be it aether, or 10-C oil. This velocity has no relation to the motion of the transmitter itself, nor are its transmitted waves material projections. Nothing is “shot” out of the moving laser. The electric field can only “soak into the medium” at the rate defined by that medium. Light can only travel at luminal velocity as defined by the dielectric medium and its dimensional relation of one over c square, a numeric constant. Light is not a material projection, it is an inductive process, a process of the aether.</p>
<p>Is it now Einstein is in basic conflict with the radio engineer? What would the F.C.C. say? Einstein is also in conflict with Ohms Law. It has been shown by Thornberg, a critic of relativity, in his paper, “Real, or Imaginary Space – Time” that electro-magnetic relations derived thru relativistic concepts are in conflict with Ohm’s Law. This is, dimensionally, canceling the per centimeter.</p>
<p>(6) Ampere, equals Ampere plus Volt</p>
<p>Apples plus oranges, ampere and volt are different dimensional relations, hence they are NOT additive. But anything seems possible with Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. The proper form is</p>
<p>(7) Volt per Ampere, or Ohm</p>
<p>Thus referring to (6) it is</p>
<p>(8) Ampere equals Ampere plus Volt per Ohm</p>
<p>This is Ohm’s Law. What are we to make of this, have we been duped?</p>
<p>As seen thus far, the factor one over c squared looks as if it represents some kind of “Universal Virtue”, it finding a way into a multitude of dimensional relations. One over c square becomes a “Vestige of God,” transcendent from mortal scrutiny, except thru the prophet Einstein. It is a seed from which to spout a religion. Thru the effort of Albert Einstein luminal velocity and the “Theory of Relativity” has in a way engendered a spiritual foundation for “Today’s Society”. “Hey bro, its all relative, man, so*…”. To question Albert Einstein can even be considered “Anti-Semitic”, hence it will be enforced.</p>
<p>* Now the Lawyer is a Priest!</p>
<p>However, Einstein is a false prophet. The Theory of Relativity as the “Holy Scripture” is like a tele-evangelistic sales pitch. Nikola Tesla regarded Relativity as the greatest historical aberration of scientific thought. Relativity is no more than a philosophical standpoint, a virus to infect a “New Age”.</p>
<p>From the standpoint of the electrical engineer Einstein’s Relativity is “Bravo-Sierra”! However, it has sunk its roots into the basic consideration of Inductance and Capacitance. L and C represent co-efficients of aetheric processes, and as such represent the aether, not Relativity. Albert Einstein stands in the way of Michael Faraday, and Pharisees are now Physicists.</p>
<p>A basic theory of Relativity was put forth by Charles Proteus Steinmetz, the “Wizard of Schenectady”. His Relativity was for use by the electrical engineer. Hereby results a great simplification when calculating transient waves on electro-magnetic transmission lines. This theory finds development in his “Theory and Calculation of Transient Electric Phenomena and Oscillation,” the section “Transients in Space and Time”. Steinmetz refers to this as “Velocity Measure”. See his “Impulses, Waves and Discharges”, page 91 to 93.</p>
<p>In complex transmission line calculation the exponential operators, as derived from the factors of the Heaviside Telegraph Equation, are expressed in both time dimensional and space dimensional relations, it is like apples and oranges, they are not additive thus cannot be combined directly into a single unified exponential operator. Analogous is the E.M.F., E, in Volts, a time derivative, and the dielectric gradient, d, in volts per centimeter, a space derivative. The two are not directly additive.</p>
<p>These complications render the general solution for the Telegraph very complex, if not impossible. In fact as of yet no general solution has been developed at all! In order to overcome this problem, Steinmetz utilized the condition that one over c square is an intrinsic property of electro-magnetic transmission lines. This is to say, the ratio of the space factors is a constant, the velocity of light. The metrical dimensions of space and time are unified thru this constant, c, and the exponential operators are now directly additive.</p>
<p>Steinmetz here transforms all space dimension relations of distance along the transmission line from centimeters to LIGHT – SECONDS. The Light – Year is an equivalent metrical relation. This is given as,</p>
<p>(9) Centimeters, or Centimeter – Second per Second,</p>
<p>Or, in the form of</p>
<p>(10) Velocity – Second, or Centimeter</p>
<p>Hence, the space dimension of distance, in centimeters, has been replaced by the product of Luminal Velocity, c, in centimeters per second, and the Time, t, in seconds, or light – seconds, ct, in a manner like Minkowski. Space factors and time factors are rendered additive thru velocity measure. This methodology allowed Steinmetz to discover previously unknown transient waves on transmission systems. Here given is the Steinmetz Theory of Relativity, a basic, easy to understand engineering tool. Late in his life C. P. Steinmetz wrote an entire book on his view of a General Theory of Relativity.</p>
<p>It should be noted that the Relativity of Steinmetz, and its velocity measure, is only useful in a Transverse Electro-magnetic situation. This is such in an E.M. transmission line as found in power and telephone work. Here all propagation is in terms of the factor one over c square. For situations involving transformer windings, or the networks utilized by the transmission systems of N. Tesla, E.F.W. Alexanderson, or even G. Marconi, this system of Relativity is not applicable. Propagation in these configurations cannot be represented by one over c square, nor any velocity at all. See the “Transmission and Reception of Telluric Electric Waves”, by E. P. Dollard.</p>
<p>The mathematical work of C. P. Steinmetz follows a basic engineer’s path as originated by Oliver Heaviside. It also is primarily directed into the dimension of time, little is given on the dimension of space, other than in a relation involving a propagation velocity, or for the determination of inductance and capacitance. Steinmetz methods fall short when propagation in transformer windings are involved. Here one must turn to the later efforts of L. V. Bewly, in “Traveling Waves on Transmission Systems”.</p>
<p>It is, in the transmission systems here discussed, the inductive fields of electricity are not involved in a motional metallic – dielectric geometry. That is to say, the inductors and the capacitors are stationary in space. However these have been given in a condition of relative motion internally, as with parameter variation. Here the inductive fields of induction are CLOSED within the metallic – dielectric geometry, which in its self is stationary in space.</p>
<p>The theory of relativity as expressed by Einstein involves a condition where the inductors and capacitors, along with their magnetic and dielectric fields respectively, are forcibly moved about in space. Here the electric induction is made to move at a velocity other than that of its natural velocity. The writings of J. J. Thompson deal extensively with this condition but Einstein makes no reference to this important work. With Einstein’s Relativity the electricity is forced into a motion beyond its own force of movement.</p>
<p>An example is a common bar magnet, engendering an extensive magnetic field of induction. When the magnet is at rest its magnetic lines of force exhibit only internal aetheric motions, outside this they are stationary. However, if this magnet is forced into motion, the magnetic lines of force react to this force of motion. This is a reactive force, much like the E.M.F. As with the E.M.F. or the brakes on a car, this reactive force only manifests during a change in velocity with respect to time.</p>
<p>(11) Velocity per Second, or Acceleration,</p>
<p>Or</p>
<p>(12) Centimeter per Second Square</p>
<p>If the velocity remains constant the reactive force is zero. This is to say, if the magnet is moving at a uniform velocity, as well as its inductive field, no forces are developed. However, the energy consumed by this motional accelerative force upon the magnet is partly given to the momentum of the mass of the magnet and partly to a stored energy in the magnetic field. Now a condition exists where a magnetic field has an apparent mechanical momentum, just as does the physical mass of the magnet. Hence the total momentum is greater than if the body of the magnet was not magnetized. One may wrongly infer the physical body gains mass in proportion to the energy of momentum. In actuality, it is stored by the magnetic field of induction. The Einsteinian concept is that the magnet gets “heavier”, as the magnet moves faster, ignoring the electrical momentum. This is faulty reasoning from the standpoint of the Faraday – Thomson understanding of electric induction. It is considered that this inertial, or reactive force, gains a considerable magnitude, as well as the quantity of stored energy, this when the velocity of the magnet nears luminal velocity. If the motional velocity is equal to the luminal velocity, the magnitude of the line of force, and the quantity of the stored energy is infinite. Here represented is the so called “limiting velocity of the speed of light, the axiom of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. The bar magnet is considered to “gain mass” in a certain proportion to the velocity of the magnet, becoming infinite at luminal velocity. Hence, nothing can go faster than light, or even as fast for that matter. Very simple idea, but founded upon a faulty inference when considered electrically.</p>
<p>Oliver Heaviside wrote quite extensively on the subject of the motional electric field, but this is ignored. He may as well have not even written it. No wonder he painted his fingernails pink! One fact unmentioned here with regard to the relativistic theory is the bar magnet carries with it a magnetic field of induction, where as, in general physical mass does not. Is it then a limiting velocity condition for “un-charged” matter? Or is it all matter carries some amount of electric induction, which gives rise to a limiting velocity? To consider the gross physical mass as an increase with its physical velocity, ignoring the momentum of the electric field, seems absurd. Here lay the lack of watertight integrity in the Titanic of Einstein’s Relativity. See page 22 to 24, “Electricity and Matter”, J. J. Thompson, and “Occult Aether Physics”, by W. Lyne.</p>
<p><strong>Electricity, Atomic Science, and Relativity:</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>It has been developed thus far the general meaning of the concept One Over c Squared. Hence a broader understanding of what is meant by the “speed of light” has been obtained. The factor, c, is best not considered a velocity, it is a proportionality ratio of time and space. By virtue of c being a ratio it is dimensionally equivalent to a velocity, but c should not be considered a velocity in and of itself.</p>
<p>Also given has been that light should not be considered a material projection, it is not, light is not the “Cereal Shot From Guns”. It has a propagation of the medium itself. For a motional transmitter, the so called “Doppler Effect” maintains the energy balance, raising the frequency in proportion to the motional velocity of the transmitter. The wavelength accordingly gets shorter. Thus the luminal velocity of the transmitted wave is always c, a constant. The concept of “hysteresis, or velocity,” was touched upon.</p>
<p>Finally, it was given thru the Faraday – Thompson concepts, that the mechanical momentum and the electrical momentum are two distinct forms of energy storage. This obviates any so called “Mass – Energy Equivalency,” no E equals mc squared. It is in reality, not relativity, the momentum of the electric field itself that grows asymptotically in magnitude when the physical velocity nears luminal velocity. These ideas are based upon the very foundation of Electrical Theory. This is shown in “Electricity and Matter”. Albert Einstein ignores these concepts in his Theory of Relativity, they just do not exist. This is given in “Occult Aether Physics”. Einstein has substituted a form of mysticism to replace logical reasoning, he is a mystic.</p>
<p>Reviewing the writings of J. J. Thompson, Atomic Science is here seen to emerge in its infant form. Concepts now considered the realm of Albert Einstein, in actuality were those of J. J. Thompson. For example, in his book “Electricity and Matter”, the idea of the Planck, a quantity of induction, is given, quote from page 63;</p>
<p>“The Faraday tubes stretching thru the Aether cannot be regarded as entirely filling it. They are rather to be looked upon as discrete threads embedded in a continuous Aether, giving to the latter a fibrous structure; but if this is the case, then on this the view we have taken of a wave of light the wave itself must have a structure, and the front of the wave, instead of being, as it were, uniformly illuminated, will be represented by a series of bright specks corresponding to the places where the Faraday tubes cut the front.” Hence the Planck, Q. Here Thompson gives its size as that of a unit Faraday Tube, this being one Coulomb. So, how bit is a Planck?</p>
<p>In his “Electricity and Matter” J. J. Thompson establishes the concept of Atomic Energy, pre-dating Einstein by a decade. To quote, from page 111;</p>
<p>“Let us take the case of the Hydrogen atom for which n equals 1000, (n is the number of Faraday tubes, or electronic corpuscles), and take for a the value usually assumed in the kinetic theory of gases for the radius of the atom, i.e., 10 to the minus 8 centimeter. Then the energy is 1.02 time 10 to the plus 19 ergs; this amount of energy would be sufficient to lift a million tons thru a height exceeding one hundred yards.” Here J. J. Thompson gives not only a dimensional relation for Atomic Energy, but establishes the size of the Planck via the tubes of induction within the Hydrogen atom. Thompson gives 1000 corpuscles, we say one electron. Hereby given is a dielectric induction, psi, in Coulomb, of 1000 lines per electron. The Planck can now be quantified. How is it that Einstein ignores all of this information in his Theory of Relativity?</p>
<p>In order to better understand the Einstein concept of “Relativity” certain concepts must be given;</p>
<p>(1) Galilean Transformation<br />
(2) Lorentz Transformation<br />
(3) Minkowski Space – Time</p>
<p>These subjects are normally out of the realm of Electrical Engineering. In brief, the Galilean Transform affixes a point of reference in space from which to observe motions in that space. Nothing is attributed to space itself. Here derived is the concept that the Earth is not the center of the Universe, it only appears so when moving with the Earth. When the system of co-ordinates for observation is “Transformed” from those of the Earth to those of the Sun, the Sun now appears the center of the universe. This transformation process can be carried, stage by stage, until a co-ordinate system at universal rest is reached, the “Cosmic Ground”. Nikola Tesla achieved this thru electrical means. Einstein’s Relativity says this is not possible, no Cosmic Ground can be found. Everything is relative, and must be so.</p>
<p>Einstein replaces the idea of a Galilean Transform with that of the Lorentz Transform. The Lorentz Transformation is in some ways like the Doppler effect, it is a numeric factor by which the impedance to motion increases asymptotically as the motional velocity nears luminal velocity. It is given by the relation,</p>
<p>(1) One minus the ratio of the velocity square to c square</p>
<p>Denoting this relation as the factor gamma square, this is the difference of alpha square and beta square, it is given by</p>
<p>(2) Gamma square, or alpha square minus beta square</p>
<p>Here alpha equals one, and beta is defined as the ratio of motional velocity, v, and the Luminal Velocity, c. Hence relation (2) represents that of a hyperbola. Hereby gamma square is</p>
<p>(3) One squared minus v squared over c squared</p>
<p>The Lorentz transform is then defined as one over gamma, and it is unity for zero motional velocity, and is infinite for a motional velocity of the speed of light. Hence the impedance to physical motion is infinite at a velocity of c, via relativistic reasoning. However is it that this is only valid for charged particles and not gross physical matter?</p>
<p>Because the Lorentz transform is the square root of a hyperbolic function, it can be inferred here by the existence of another “so called Universe” where a particle cannot slow down to the speed of light. Hence a pair of conditions exist here. One group of particles cannot be accelerated up to the speed of light, and a conjugate group of particles cannot be de-accelerated down to the speed of light. Wow Mr. Wizard, Einstein never told us that!</p>
<p>Minkowski space – time has already been discussed, but in review, Cartesian third order space is made Minkowski fourth order space by the addition of a fictitious co-ordinate, or length, derived as a light – second, ct. To be “cool” Minkowski affixes a versor operator, the square root of minus one, to this fictional length. Gaussian co-ordinates are utilized.</p>
<p>Combining terms from the versor hyperbolic function of the Lorentz transform to the terms of the Minkowski four – space produces a resultant 16 co-ordinates, (or wrongly dimesions). Consider the versor operator on the fourth co-ordinate, or light – second, here exists four distinct “space – time continuums” in two quadrature time frames, all this with the velocity of light as a common pole. This has now become in-ordinatly overcomplicated, but thru the lawyer style skill of the Einsteinian Physicists all terms are erased that do not fit the chosen idea. It may be inferred that A. Einstein was not much of a mathematician, and by ignoring J. J. Thompson he was not much of a scientist. Not a mathematician, not a scientist, not an engineer, so just what was Albert Einstein anyway? He was a Mystic.</p>
<p>Basic electrical knowledge is based upon the theories known as “Faraday – Maxwell”. Out of this basic “arch-form” have grown the</p>
<p>(1) Maxwell – Thompson Theory</p>
<p>(2) Maxwell – Heaviside Theory</p>
<p>(3) Maxwell – Lorentz Theory</p>
<p>(4) Maxwell – Einstein Theory</p>
<p>It is that Maxwell has many interpreters, but where is Maxwell’s words? This is much like Christianity. Many religions, many churches, but no Jesus. Jesus is not a welcome guest in any church, nor is Maxwell. Here given is an intrinsic property of Human Society. It is written, it is invariably terminal, Jesus at age 33.</p>
<p>In the advancement of electrical engineering theory C. P. Steinmetz dropped Maxwell all together. Hereby Steinmetz developed his important transformer equations, the very foundation of transformer theory. The first vestige of a theory on longitudinal electric waves is seen here. Steinmetz primarily directed his efforts to the metrical dimension of time, using ideas and terms finding their origin in Oliver Heaviside. The dimension of space is primarily treated only in terms of a velocity, that is, as space – time. In his development of the Faraday concepts and inductance &amp; capacitance the dimension of space is considered on its own, but to a limited extent. It seems that we just simply cannot separate space from the velocity of light.</p>
<p><strong>The Lamare Longitudinal Transmission Experiment/N.F.G Interlude:</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>I received Lamare’s package of material, very good to see the activity it has roused. I am not sure as to how the spherical antenna is made, nor the field patterns it engenders so I can offer no comment.</p>
<p>Plenty of N.F.G. here in Lone Pine. Here N.F.G. for me was the Annenburg Foundation of Los Angeles. Useless Einsteiners. Same story, Oh yes I will help you, let me store your driveshaft, it will be fine. Then it all vanished. Duped again. Further, oriental mysticism blocks my writing on forum!</p>
<p>I fail to understand why what I have shown repeatedly thru experiment and theory just seems to fly over everyone’s head. I use no more than high school science and math. The impediment can only be attributed to a pathological mysticism, or mental retardation. While the latter is intrinsic, the former is induced. Is it no surprise that the only man in Lone Pone who gets what I am saying is a truck driver, Bart. My Einstein series was initiated by him and is thus dedicated to him.</p>
<p>The mystical experience is the force which moves one to science. It is transitory. The mysticism dissolves into Science and then bears fruit as Engineering. Mysticism, as defined in my writing, is not transitory. It is continuous and thus hates Science. Without a mystery the mystic is no longer the priest. This is a Platonic Epistemology. It is based upon Faith, not upon Reason. This is a necessity in Christianity, however in the majority of situations this Faith is based upon nebulous reasoning. With Lawyer like skill it’s factors change meaning depending upon their position in space, time, or “attitude”. Platonic reasoning is ultimately Totalitarian. See “Occult Science Dictatorship” by Lyne.</p>
<p>This Platonic reasoning is next taken up by Einstein and formed into a Kabalistic-Existentialist view of physical reality, this in direct conflict with Nature’s Laws. Einstein is the image of an ultimate and infallible creature who should be regarded as a God. The i force society of today is the flower, me, my, I, and you, you’re a piece of ****! Here lay the foundation for the extinction of Science and Engineering in the U.S.A. Wow, Mr. Wizard, do they want to kill us? See the Commonweal – Michael – Lerner, Judaic – Buddistic Global Religion Philosophy. To say any more on Einstein would be, as Oliver said, “Slaying the slain.” Let dead dogs lay.</p>
<p>However, to continue pandering, Bearden takes us right back to mysticism. But more so, he is a dis-informer making sure no one figures out Tesla. What would Israel say about “Tesla Weapons” in Iran? Or, would we want them in the hands of Israel?</p>
<p>Then we have the Corum, K.L. and J.F. This is the P.E.E.E. Forget them, no Tesla knowledge exists here. And then A. Puharich (not real name). Remember at the “Last Supper” R. Josh Reynolds cut funding to A. Puharich, stating I had done more on Food Stamps than he had with millions of dollars. I am QRU on all this. In reality only I seem to be able to understand Tesla and I guess that should make me feel good, so that’s that.</p>
<p>At this time I am engaged in the study of details for the continuation of Inductance and Capacitance series of writings. The established dimensional relations are N.F.G., even in the writings of C.P. Steinmetz. Too many canceled dimensions thru unit values, and lots of missing versors in space. For example, in Inductance calculations the radius of a circle is a line, the circumference of a circle is a circle. Here we have two distinct co-ordinate systems, or vector expressions, a kind of space quadrature. Thus</p>
<blockquote><p>c = 2πr Centimeters</p></blockquote>
<p>is not vectorally complete, it is</p>
<blockquote><p>c = 2 πkr Centimeters</p></blockquote>
<p>where k is a versor operator. Hence it is that c and 2πr are not interchangeable. Here is an important complication in the dimensional relations for Inductance and Capacitance.</p>
<p>As for the factor pi over two in the Longitudinal Velocity, it represents an integration and is not an actual velocity, per-se. This pi over two also can result from improper derivation of the distributed constants for transmission structures. This is shown in the paper (I.R.E.) “Electrical Oscillations in Antennae and Induction Coils”, J. Miller, 1919.</p>
<p>The propagation of a Transverse Electro-Magnetic Wave is given by the dimensional relation</p>
<blockquote><p>Centimeter per Second,<br />
Or Velocity, v</p></blockquote>
<p>This represents the ratio of space, centimeter, to time, second.</p>
<p>In a conjugate form the propagation constant of a Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric Wave is given by the dimensional relation,</p>
<blockquote><p>Per Centimeter, per Second,<br />
Or per (Centimeter – Second)</p>
<p>Counter – Velocity, u.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is the ratio of counterspace, per centimeter, to time, seconds.</p>
<p>In an alternate form of expression, the T.E.M. propagation constant is the square root of the product</p>
<blockquote><p>Henry per Second, Mu</p></blockquote>
<p>And,</p>
<blockquote><p>Farad per Second, Epsilon.</p></blockquote>
<p>And for the L.M.D. propagation constant, it is the square root of the product</p>
<blockquote><p>Per (Henry – Centimeter)</p></blockquote>
<p>And</p>
<blockquote><p>Per (Farad – Centimeter)</p></blockquote>
<p>The composite propagation constant hence is the superposition of the velocity, v, and the counter velocity, u. The two are not dimensionally additive so a versor and a dimensional transform of centimeter square is required.</p>
<p>The T.E.M. wave is always along the axis of the metallic geometry, tangent to the metallic boundary. Such is given by the “Co-axial Cable”. Conversely, the L.M.D. wave is always perpendicular to the axis of the metallic geometry, normal to the metallic boundary. Such is given by the “Transformer Winding”. The resulting complex propagation of v and u is a spiral with a tilt angle from the metallic axes of the coiled winding. Where T.E.M. waves drag into the metallic (electron flow) the L.M.D. wave bypasses the metallic (no electron flow) hence no Ohmic resistance. The factor pi over two is the composite propagation for only a unique set of parameters. See “The Oscillating Coil” part of the “Theory of Wireless Power” E.P. Dollard. Note here that errors found a way into the tables, but the equations are right. Now why could not the Corum’s figure this out? Why is it they make no reference to any work on this by Blume, Bewely, Dollard, and etc? The Corums, Well?</p>
<p>One very important fact that escapes notice (Meyl, et al) is that Tesla’s transmission networks are Mono-Polar. The dipolar concepts so dear to all now swirl down the toilet bowl (burp). Forget Bearden, Forget Meyl, it is crap for the crapper! Tesla circumvents the concept of plus and minus, there is one pole only, plus. Here is a true “Single Phase” Alternating Current, one wire only. This is a philosophically disruptive concept for the God vs. Devil duality. God has no opposite pole, it is one, positive only. This is the secret to the Tesla transmission concept. Action vs. Reaction now is voided.</p>
<p>When considering a resonant coil in its fundamental mode of oscillation, as the Tesla “Extra Coil”, the potential e at the terminal end is 90º (π/2 radians) ahead in time phase compared to the E.M.F. E at the lower end. This is given by the relation</p>
<blockquote><p>E = (b/a)*jE</p></blockquote>
<p>Where</p>
<blockquote><p>e, the Electrostatic Potential in Volts</p>
<p>E, is the Electro-Motive Force in Volts</p>
<p>a, is the Power Factor</p>
<p>b, is the Induction Factor of the Oscillating Coil</p></blockquote>
<p>It is hereby seen that no circulation of flux lines is possible, hence the coil becomes “Longitudinally Transmissive.” Potential e and E.M.F. E exist in separate time frames. This relationship cannot be produced by a two wire (T.E.M. quarter wave line because here the laws of circuitation rule. It must be a single wire so configured as to allow propagation normal to the axis of the metallic boundary, (L.M.D.).</p>
<p>Hereby enclosing the electrostatic terminal of a Tesla transmission system within a metallic sphere will fail to shield the radial dielectric lines of force, whereas a dipolar system within the metallic sphere cannot get out of this sphere except that leaking thru the transmission line entry opening. It is that simple, but no one gets it. Every one jumps back to Bearden, Corum, Meyl, and stays mystified, WHY?</p>
<p>Certain considerations present themselves when applying the notion of “Antenna Gain” with regard to T.E.M. and L.M.D. propagation. The directivity of T.E.M. waves is based on the spatial dimensional relation of area. High gain is a large aperture, centimeter square, (a big dish). It is given dimensionally as</p>
<blockquote><p>Area equals</p>
<p>Width times k*Height</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a cross product, k is the right angle operator, a versor of dimensionless form. Wave propagation is normal to the surface of this area of width cross height, on the axis of versor k. Heaviside calls this</p>
<blockquote><p>Vwh = l</p></blockquote>
<p>The transverse product of width and height is length. V is his vector product operator.</p>
<p>The situation is much different for the L.M.D. wave. Directivity here is co-linear, or axial. Dimensionally it is given as</p>
<blockquote><p>Length times Length</p>
<p>Equals Length squared</p></blockquote>
<p>Wave propagation is co-linear with this length squared. This axial “Antenna” must now be counter – spatial in form, that is, it must be subdivided. The apparent physical length here is now only an integrated resultant derived from the summation of counterspatial spans. A ruler with 16th inch spans has a physical length of one foot. Hereby it may be that a “Big Dish” is not the way to go for L.M.D. waves.</p>
<p>However, by another line of reasoning, since we have no established Truths as of yet, consider “Electric Sound Waves” in the Aether. After all that is what Tesla said. See Thornberg’s work on “Maxwellian electric sound waves in the Aether”. So it is required to make an electrical analog to sound. Helmholtz works to cover this but Heaviside points out the math is no good.</p>
<p>The P and S seismic wave analog looks good. What is needed is an alternative to Mu in Henry per centimeter and Epsilon in Farad per centimeter. In the L.M.D. theory it is not Mu nor Epsilon but per (Henry – cm) and per (Farad – cm). This is seen in the P &amp; S wave papers sent to me by Lamare. Tesla praised Helmholtz but it may take another Oliver to make it work. Here a “Big Dish” may work.</p>
<p>Finally, I put out on the “Heretical Builder” forum an Alexanderson “Antenna” for the 160 meter ham band. It is a scalar (space) wave guide structure and has no wavelength, hence “space scalar”. This network is scaled upon the 18.6 kilo-cycle version made for the Navy at station KET, Bolinas, California. A scale of 100 to 1 was selected hence 18.6 kc becomes 1860 kc, a ham frequency. This network produces a Longitudinal Dielectric form of propagation, with no magnetic component. Pure “Dielectric Waves” ala J.J. Thomson. Space scalar transmission may be possible between identical units in phase sync. A great ham radio project, but you will not find it in QST. But no one makes it, has Ham radio, once considered a National Technical Asset, now become a useless hobby of self denial? If so, the F.C.C. will no longer consider it valid and take steps to phase it out of existence by some “911 phantasy laws”. So do we run back to Bearden’s dipoles smashing electrons on the 405 freeway, back to Meyl’s Edmund Scientific Toys, and back to the Corum math masterbations upon the resonant coil, back to the feet of the one wing parrot? I hope not!</p>
<p><strong>Einstein, Tesla, and the Wizard of Oz:</strong></p>
<p>Einstein and his theories can be expressed by an animal story: As understood thru his writing Relativity as a “package of ideas” is in many ways similar to the “egg of the coo-coo bird”. The coo-coo bird builds no nest of its own, it looks for the right next among those other birds. Here found it lays its egg in the selected next of another bird. Upon hatching its chick forces the others out of the nest, over the side. Such is the growth cycle of Relativity, as given by Einstein.</p>
<p>In order to understand the Einsteinian reasoning certain logical relationships are taken from “Relativity”, by Albert Einstein, Random House Publisher, 1916, page 50. Here given is;</p>
<p>(1) Proposition (A) is Electro-Dynamic Theory, Maxwell – Lorentz.</p>
<p>(2) Proposition (B) is Relativistic Theory Einstein – Minkowski.</p>
<p>(3) There are many experiments in favor of (A), or also in favor of (B).</p>
<p>(4) These experiments “limit the theoretical possibilities” so that only (A) holds to the test of experience.</p>
<p>(5) Certain experiments conform to (A) thru an “Auxiliary Hypothesis” which is “extraneous without (B).”</p>
<p>Consider Einstein’s statement on the same page 50;</p>
<p>“In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the difficulty that electro-dynamic theory of itself is unable to give an account of their nature.” “For since electrical masses constituting the electron would necessarily be scattered under the influence of their mutual repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them the nature of which has hitherto remained obscure to us.”</p>
<p>Forces of another kind, you mean the dielectric lines of force, removed from obscurity by the Faraday – Thompson concept of induction? Every electron is a motional terminus of a quantity of dielectric lines of force, these lines contracting and stretching like rubber bands, giving motion to the terminus electron. The thermionic electron contracts, pulling the electron, the cathode ray stretching, pulled by the electron. In the former case the lines of force are dissipated, in the latter case the line of force are projected, both cases the electrons assume ray like motion, with non participating lines of force filling the voids, directing the electrons. Hence, it is the electrons travel in straight lines, that is, rays.</p>
<p>These facts have been known from the initial invention of the “Vacuum Tube” by Sir William Crookes, leading to the extensive experimental work into atomic science by J. J. Thompson, and Nikola Tesla. It is here seen that the so-called electron is only a shadow, its apparent physical mass is only an electrical momentum. There is no rest mass to an electron. It is given here the electron is no more than a broken loose “hold fast” under the grip of the tensions within the dielectric lines of force. They are the broken ends of the split in half package of spaghetti. Obviously this reasoning is not welcome in the realm of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Are we to believe that Einstein had no prior knowledge of the most prominent theoretical and experimental work of his time?</p>
<p>Continuing from “Relativity” by Albert Einstein, page 51.</p>
<p>“The second class of facts to which we have alluded has a reference to the question whether or not the motion of the Earth in space can be made perceptible in terrestrial experiments.”…”All attempts of this nature led to a negative result.” Einstein’s Relativity leads to the conclusion that no point of reference in the Galilean sense can actually exist, that is, all points of reference are relative to each other. This relativity is in a Lorentz transform rather that a Galilean Transform. No absolute reference possible, it is everything is relative. This is tantamount to the denial of the existence of God. Forgotten is that relativity did not find favor in its day, for this very reason, it is atheistic. Like Existentialism, or Cubism, Relativism represents a most destructive philosophical construct by which to afflict modern man. The destructive philosophical forces flowered as the “Third Reich”.</p>
<p>The monophasic dielectric forces developed thru the work of Nikola Tesla nullify relativistic relations. Tesla, thru a unique space-time hysteresis electrically “grounded” to a zero order Galilean coordinate system. It is also the cathode ray projector tubes utilized by Tesla in his atomic studies also nullify relativistic relations. Tesla’s remarks about “radiant matter” indicate the existence of cosmic rays of immense penetrating power moving fifty (50) times faster than the velocity of light (Le Sage particles). Here Albert Einstein is in direct contradiction with the experimental researches of Nikola Tesla, and in complete ignorance of the experimental researches of J. J. Thompson. Einstein “layed his egg” in the “nest of Faraday”. From here it is that “Theoretical Physics” is henceforth divorced from “Electrical Science”. In turn Theoretical Physics made a “Wh*re” of Maxwell, the “offspring” of Faraday.</p>
<p>Recently, in the “Los Angeles Times” newspaper, a series of page long editorials were given on Einstein, this as “Damage Control” over the European C.E.R.N. superluminal particle experiments. The L.A . Times is harsh, stating that C.E.R.N. was irresponsible, and must ask for permission to publish such findings! Later editorial writings express Einstein as the supreme authority, the spiritual master, etc. Well, after all, He pushed to make an E equals mc squared bomb to effect the genocide of the German People. A real holy man, don’t you think?</p>
<p>In epilogue, when Albert Einstein came to America, amid the accolades, and the fanfare, he was naturally introduced to T. A. Edison, the “Axle grease and timbers” all American Scientist-Inventor. The “coyote like” Edison cunningly produced one of his company intelligence tests for Einstein to complete. Einstein did not do so good on Edison’s company examination, he did not know the speed of sound! Is it possible here that Einstein is just another version of Marconi, both in defiance to Tesla. Finally, January 1, 200 A Time Magazine cover declares Albert Einstein the “Man of the Century”. We verily have been duped!</p>
<p>So here we stand. We have penetrated the Giant One Winged Parrot. While the multitudes have been quivering at the feet of this awesome idol, the Poodle went around to the rear of it, revealing no more than a diminutive circus operator at a small control panel. This formidable idol is no more than a giant CIRCUS PROP! Now can we go back to Kansas?</p>
<p>73 DE N6KPH SK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borderlandresearch.com/the-theory-of-anti-relativity/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Energy Now</title>
		<link>http://borderlandresearch.com/the-world-of-free-energy?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-world-of-free-energy</link>
		<comments>http://borderlandresearch.com/the-world-of-free-energy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Borderlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold Fusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikola Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Lindemann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schauberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vortex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderlandresearch.com/?p=2244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The World Of Free Energy by Peter Lindemann, D.Sc. In the late 1880&#8242;s, trade journals in the electrical sciences were predicting free electricity and free energy in the near future. Incredible discoveries about the nature of electricity were becoming common place. Nikola Tesla was demonstrating &#8220;wireless lighting&#8221; and other wonders associated with high frequency currents. There was an excitement about the future like never before. Within 20 years, there would be automobiles, airplanes, movies, recorded music, telephones, radio, and practical &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://borderlandresearch.com/the-world-of-free-energy">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button" share_url="http://borderlandresearch.com/the-world-of-free-energy"></a></div><h2>The World Of Free Energy by Peter Lindemann, D.Sc.</h2>
<p><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/image.png"><img style="background-image: none; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Free Energy Lindemann Tesla Schauberger Cold Fusion" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/image_thumb.png" alt="Free Energy Tesla Schauberger Cold Fusion" width="244" height="177" align="right" border="0" /></a>In the late 1880&#8242;s, trade journals in the electrical sciences were predicting free electricity and <strong>free energy</strong> in the near future. Incredible discoveries about the nature of electricity were becoming common place. Nikola Tesla was demonstrating &#8220;wireless lighting&#8221; and other wonders associated with high frequency currents. There was an excitement about the future like never before.</p>
<p>Within 20 years, there would be automobiles, airplanes, movies, recorded music, telephones, radio, and practical cameras. The Victorian Age was giving way to something totally new. For the first time in history, common people were encouraged to envision a utopian future filled with abundant modern transportation and communication, as well as jobs, housing and food for everyone. Disease would be conquered, and so would poverty. Life was getting better, and this time, everyone was going to get a piece of the pie. So, what happened? In the midst of this technological explosion, where did the energy breakthroughs go? Was all of this excitement about <em>free energy</em>, which happened just before the beginning of the last century, just wishful thinking that &#8220;real science&#8221; eventually disproved?</p>
<h3>Current State of Free Energy Technology</h3>
<p>Actually, the answer to that question is no. In fact, the opposite is true. Spectacular energy technologies were developed right along with the other breakthroughs. Since that time, multiple methods for producing vast amounts of energy at extremely low cost have been developed. None of these technologies have made it to the consumer market as an article of commerce, however. Exactly why this is true will be discussed shortly.</p>
<p>But first, I would like to describe to you a short list of <span style="text-decoration: underline;">free energy</span> technologies that I am currently aware of, and that are proven beyond all reasonable doubt. The common feature connecting all of these discoveries, is that they use a small amount of one form of energy to control or release a large amount of a different kind of energy. Many of them tap the underlying Æther field in some way; a source of energy conveniently ignored by modern science.</p>
<p>1) Radiant Energy. Nikola Tesla&#8217;s magnifying transmitter, T. Henry Moray&#8217;s radiant energy device, Edwin Gray&#8217;s EMA motor, and Paul Baumann&#8217;s Testatika machine all run on radiant energy. This natural energy form can be gathered directly from the environment (mistakenly called &#8220;static&#8221; electricity) or extracted from ordinary electricity by the method called fractionation. Radiant energy can perform the same wonders as ordinary electricity, at less than 1% of the cost. It does not behave exactly like electricity, however, which has contributed to the scientific community&#8217;s misunderstanding of it. The Methernitha Community in Switzerland currently has 5 or 6 working models of fuelless, self-running devices that tap this energy.</p>
<p>2) Permanent Magnets. Dr. Robert Adams (NZ) has developed astounding designs of electric motors, generators and heaters that run on permanent magnets. One such device draws 100 watts of electricity from the source, generates 100 watts to recharge the source, and produces over 140 BTU&#8217;s of heat in two minutes! Dr. Tom Bearden (USA) has two working models of a permanent magnet powered electrical transformer. It uses a 6-watt electrical input to control the path of a magnetic field coming out of a permanent magnet. By channeling the magnetic field, first to one output coil and then a second output coil, and by doing this repeatedly and rapidly in a &#8220;ping-pong&#8221; fashion, the device can produce a 96-watt electrical output with no moving parts. Bearden calls his device a Motionless Electromagnetic Generator, or MEG. Jean-Louis Naudin has duplicated Bearden&#8217;s device in France. The principles for this type of device were first disclosed by Frank Richardson (USA) in 1978. Troy Reed (USA) has working models of a special magnetized fan that heats up as it spins. It takes exactly the same amount of energy to spin the fan whether it is generating heat or not. Beyond these developments, multiple inventors have identified working mechanisms that produce motor torque from permanent magnets alone.</p>
<p>3) Mechanical Heaters. There are two classes of machines that transform a small amount of mechanical energy into a large amount of heat. The best of these purely mechanical designs are the rotating cylinder systems designed by Frenette (USA) and Perkins (USA). In these machines, one cylinder is rotated within another cylinder with about an eighth of an inch of clearance between them. The space between the cylinders is filled with a liquid such as water or oil, and it is this &#8220;working fluid&#8221; that heats up as the inner cylinder spins. Another method uses magnets mounted on a wheel to produce large eddy currents in a plate of aluminum, causing the aluminum to heat up rapidly. These magnetic heaters have been demonstrated by Muller (Canada), Adams (NZ) and Reed (USA). All of these systems can produce ten times more heat than standard methods using the same energy input.</p>
<p>4) Super-Efficient Electrolysis. Water can be broken into hydrogen and oxygen using electricity. Standard chemistry books claim that this process requires more energy than can be recovered when the gases are recombined. This is true only under the worst case scenario. When water is hit with its own molecular resonant frequency, using a system developed by Stan Meyers (USA) and again recently by Xogen Power, Inc., it collapses into hydrogen and oxygen gas with very little electrical input. Also, using different electrolytes (additives that make the water conduct electricity better) changes the efficiency of the process dramatically. It is also known that certain geometric structures and surface textures work better than others do. The implication is that unlimited amounts of hydrogen fuel can be made to drive engines (like in your car) for the cost of water. Even more amazing is the fact that a special metal alloy was patented by Freedman (USA) in 1957 that spontaneously breaks water into hydrogen and oxygen with no outside electrical input and without causing any chemical changes in the metal itself. This means that this special metal alloy can make hydrogen from water for free, forever.</p>
<p>5) Implosion/Vortex. All major industrial engines use the release of heat to cause expansion and pressure to produce work, like in your car engine. Nature uses the opposite process of cooling to cause suction and vacuum to produce work, like in a tornado. Viktor Schauberger (Austria) was the first to build working models of implosion engines in the 1930&#8242;s and 1940&#8242;s. Since that time, Callum Coats has published extensively on Schauberger&#8217;s work in his book Living Energies and subsequently, a number of researchers have built working models of implosion turbine engines. These are fuelless engines that produce mechanical work from energy accessed from a vacuum. There are also much simpler designs that use vortex motions to tap a combination of gravity and centrifugal force to produce a continuous motion in fluids.</p>
<p>6) Cold Fusion. In March 1989, two chemists from the University of Utah (USA) announced that they had produced atomic fusion reactions in a simple tabletop device. The claims were &#8220;debunked&#8221; within six months and the public lost interest. Nevertheless, cold fusion is very real. Not only has excess heat production been repeatedly documented, but also low energy atomic element transmutation has been catalogued, involving dozens of different reactions! This technology definitely can produce low cost energy and scores of other important industrial processes.</p>
<p>7) Solar Assisted Heat Pumps. The refrigerator in your kitchen is the only free energy machine you currently own. It&#8217;s an electrically operated heat pump. It uses one amount of energy (electricity) to move three amounts of energy (heat). This gives it a co-efficient of performance (COP) of about 3. Your refrigerator uses one amount of electricity to pump three amounts of heat from the inside of the refrigerator to the outside of the refrigerator. This is its typical use, but it is the worst possible way to use the technology. Here&#8217;s why. A heat pump pumps heat from the source of heat to the &#8220;sink&#8221; or place that absorbs the heat. The source of heat should obviously be hot and the sink for heat should obviously be cold for this process to work the best. In your refrigerator, it&#8217;s exactly the opposite. The source of heat is inside the box, which is cold, and the sink for heat is the room temperature air of your kitchen, which is warmer than the source. This is why the COP remains low for your kitchen refrigerator. But this is not true for all heat pumps. COP&#8217;s of 8 to 10 are easily attained with solar assisted heat pumps. In such a device, a heat pump draws heat from a solar collector and dumps the heat into a large underground absorber, which remains at 55° F, and mechanical energy is extracted in the transfer. This process is equivalent to a steam engine that extracts mechanical energy between the boiler and the condenser, except that it uses a fluid that boils at a much lower temperature than water. One such system that was tested in the 1970&#8242;s produced 350 hp, measured on a Dynamometer, in a specially designed engine from just 100-sq. ft. of solar collector. (This is not the system promoted by Dennis Lee.) The amount of energy it took to run the compressor (input) was less than 20 hp, so this system produced more than 17 times more energy than it took to keep it going! It could power a small neighborhood from the roof of a hot tub gazebo, using exactly the same technology that keeps the food cold in your kitchen. Currently, there is an industrial scale heat pump system just north of Kona, Hawaii that generates electricity from temperature differences in ocean water.</p>
<p>There are dozens of other systems that I have not mentioned, many of them are as viable and well tested as the ones I have just recounted. But this short list is sufficient to make my point: free energy technology is here, now. It offers the world pollution-free, energy abundance for everyone, everywhere.</p>
<p>It is now possible to stop the production of greenhouse gases and shut down all of the nuclear power plants. We can now desalinate unlimited amounts of seawater at an affordable price, and bring adequate fresh water to even the most remote habitats. Transportation costs and the production costs for just about everything can drop dramatically. Food can even be grown in heated greenhouses in the winter, anywhere. All of these wonderful benefits that can make life on this planet so much easier and better for everyone have been postponed for decades. Why? Whose purposes are served by this postponement?</p>
<p>Four Invisible Forces</p>
<p>There are four gigantic forces that have worked together to create this situation. To say that there is and has been a conspiracy to suppress this technology only leads to a superficial understanding of the world, and it places the blame for this completely outside of ourselves. Our willingness to remain ignorant and actionless in the face of this situation has always been interpreted by two of these forces as implied consent. So, besides a non-demanding public, what are the other forces that are impeding the availability of free energy technology?</p>
<p>In the United States, and in most other countries around the world, there is a money monopoly in place. I am free to earn as much money as I want, but I will only be paid in Federal Reserve Notes. There is nothing I can do to be paid in Gold Certificates, or some other form of money. This money monopoly is solely in the hands of a small number of private stock banks, and these banks are owned by the wealthiest families in the world. Their plan is to eventually control 100% of all of the capital resources of the world, and thereby control everyone&#8217;s life through the availability (or non-availability) of all goods and services.</p>
<p>An independent source of wealth (free energy device) in the hands of each and every person in the world, ruins the plans of the wealthiest families for world domination, permanently. Why this is true is easy to see. Currently, a nation&#8217;s economy can be either slowed down or sped up by the raising or lowering of interest rates. But if an independent source of capital (energy) were present in the economy, and any business or person could raise more capital without borrowing it from a bank, this centralized throttling action on interest rates would simply not have the same effect.</p>
<p>Free energy technology changes the value of money. The wealthiest families and the issuers of credit do not want any competition. It&#8217;s that simple. They want to maintain their current monopoly control of the money supply. For them, free energy technology is not just something to suppress, it must be permanently forbidden!</p>
<p>So, the wealthiest families and their central banking institutions are the first force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology. Their motivations are the imagined divine right to rule, greed, and their insatiable need to control almost everything except themselves. The weapons they have used to enforce this postponement include intimidation, &#8220;expert&#8221; debunkers, buying and shelving of technology, murder and attempted murder of the inventors, character assassination, arson, and a wide variety of financial incentives and disincentives to manipulate possible supporters. They have also promoted the general acceptance of a scientific theory that states that free energy is impossible (laws of thermodynamics).</p>
<p>The second force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology is national governments. The problem here is not so much related to competition in the printing of currency, but in the maintenance of national security. The fact is, the world out there is a jungle, and humans can be counted upon to be very cruel, dishonest, and sneaky. It is government&#8217;s job to provide for the common defense. For this, police powers are delegated by the executive branch of government to enforce &#8220;the rule of law.&#8221; Most of us who consent to the rule of law do so because we believe it is the right thing to do, for our own benefit. There are always a few individuals, however, that believe that their own benefit is best served by behavior that does not voluntarily conform to the generally agreed upon social order. These people choose to operate outside of the rule of law and are considered outlaws, criminals, subversives, traitors, revolutionaries, or terrorists.</p>
<p>Most national governments have discovered, by trial and error, that the only foreign policy that really works, over time, is a policy called &#8220;tit for tat.&#8221; What this means to you and me is, that governments treat each other the way they are being treated. There is a constant jockeying for position and influence in world affairs, and the strongest party wins! In economics, it&#8217;s the Golden Rule, which states: &#8220;The one with the gold makes the rules.&#8221;</p>
<p>So it is with politics also, but its appearance is more Darwinian. It&#8217;s simply survival of the fittest. In politics, however, the fittest has come to mean the strongest party who is also willing to fight the dirtiest. Absolutely every means available is used to maintain an advantage over the adversary, and everyone else is the adversary regardless of whether they are considered friend or foe. This includes outrageous psychological posturing, lying, cheating, spying, stealing, assassination of world leaders, proxy wars, alliances and shifting alliances, treaties, foreign aid, and the presence of military forces wherever possible.</p>
<p>Like it or not, this is the psychological and actual arena national governments operate in. No national government will do anything that simply gives an adversary an advantage for free. It&#8217;s national suicide. An activity by any individual, inside or outside the country, that is interpreted as giving an adversary an edge or advantage will be deemed a threat to &#8220;national security.&#8221;</p>
<p>Free energy technology is a national government&#8217;s worst nightmare! Openly acknowledged, free energy technology sparks an unlimited arms race by all governments in a final attempt to gain absolute advantage and domination. Think about it. Do you think Japan will not feel intimidated if China gets free energy? Do you think Israel will sit by quietly as Iraq acquires free energy? Do you think India will allow Pakistan to develop free energy? Do you think the USA would not try to stop Osama bin Laden from getting free energy?</p>
<p>Unlimited energy available to the current state of affairs on this planet leads to an inevitable reshuffling of the balance of power. This could become an all-out war to prevent &#8220;the other&#8221; from having the advantage of unlimited wealth and power. Everybody will want it, and at the same time, want to prevent everyone else from getting it.</p>
<p>So, national governments are the second force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology. Their motivations are &#8220;self-preservation.&#8221; This self-preservation operates on three levels. First, by not giving undue advantage to an external enemy. Second, by preventing individualized action capable of effectively challenging official police powers (anarchy) within the country. And third, by preserving income streams derived from taxing energy sources currently in use. Their weapons include the preventing of the issuance of patents based on national security grounds, the legal and illegal harassment of inventors with criminal charges, tax audits, threats, phone taps, arrest, arson, theft of property during shipment, and a host of other intimidations which make the business of building and marketing a free energy machine practically impossible.</p>
<p>The third force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology consists of the group of deluded inventors and out right charlatans and con men. On the periphery of the extraordinary scientific breakthroughs that constitute the real free energy technologies, lies a shadow world of unexplained anomalies, marginal inventions and unscrupulous promoters. The first two forces have constantly used the media to promote the worst examples of this group, to distract the public&#8217;s attention and to discredit the real breakthroughs by associating them with the obvious frauds.</p>
<p>Over the last hundred years, dozens of stories have surfaced about unusual inventions. Some of these ideas have so captivated the public&#8217;s imagination that a mythology about these systems continues to this day. Names like Keely, Hubbard, Coler, and Henderschott immediately come to mind. There may be real technologies behind these names, but there simply isn&#8217;t enough technical data available in the public domain to make a determination. These names remain associated with a free energy mythology, however, and are sited by debunkers as examples of fraud.</p>
<p>The idea of free energy taps very deeply into the human subconscious mind. A few inventors with marginal technologies that demonstrate useful anomalies have mistakenly exaggerated the importance of their inventions. Some of these inventors also have mistakenly exaggerated the importance of themselves for having invented it. A combination of &#8220;gold fever&#8221; and/or a messiah complex appears, wholly distorting any future contribution they may make.</p>
<p>While the research thread they are following may hold great promise, these deluded inventors begin to trade enthusiasm for facts, and the value of the scientific work from that point on suffers greatly. There is a powerful, yet subtle seduction that can warp a personality if they believe that the world rests on their shoulders or that they are the world&#8217;s savior. Strange things also happen to people when they think they are about to become extremely rich. It takes a tremendous spiritual discipline to remain objective and humble in the presence of a working free energy machine.</p>
<p>Many inventors&#8217; psyches become unstable just believing they have a free energy machine. As the quality of the science deteriorates, some inventors also develop a persecution complex that makes them very defensive and unapproachable. This process precludes them from ever really developing a free energy machine, and fuels the fraud mythologies tremendously.</p>
<p>Then there are the out right con men. In the last 15 years, there is one person in the USA who has raised the free energy con to a professional art. He has raised more than $100,000,000, has been barred from doing business in the state of Washington, has been jailed in California, and he&#8217;s still at it. He always talks about a variation of one of the real free energy systems, sells people on the idea that they will get one of these systems soon, but ultimately sells them only promotional information which gives no real data about the energy system itself. He has mercilessly preyed upon the Christian community and the patriot community in the USA, and is still going strong.</p>
<p>This man&#8217;s current scam involves signing up hundreds of thousands of people as locations where he will install a free energy machine. In exchange for letting him put the free energy generator in their home, they will get free electricity for life, and his company will sell the excess energy back to the local utility company. After becoming convinced that they will receive free electricity for life, with no out-front expenses, they gladly buy a video that helps draw their friends into the scam as well. Once you understand the power and motivations of the first two forces I have discussed, its obvious that this person&#8217;s current business plan cannot be implemented. This one person has probably done more harm to the free energy movement in the USA than any other force, by destroying people&#8217;s trust in the technology.</p>
<p>So, the third force postponing the public availability of free energy technology is delusion and dishonesty within the movement itself. The motivations are self-aggrandizement, greed, want of power over others, and a false sense of self-importance. The weapons used are lying, cheating, the &#8220;bait and switch&#8221; con, self-delusion and arrogance combined with lousy science.</p>
<p>The fourth force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology is all of the rest of us. It may be easy to see how narrow and selfish the motivations of the other forces are, but actually, these motivations are still very much alive in each of us as well. Like the Wealthiest Families, don&#8217;t we each secretly harbor illusions of false superiority, and the want to control others instead of ourselves? Also, wouldn&#8217;t you &#8220;sell out&#8221; if the price were high enough, say, take a million dollars, cash, today? Or like the governments, don&#8217;t we each want to ensure our own survival? If caught in the middle of a full, burning theater, do you panic and push all of the weaker people out of the way in a mad, scramble for the door? Or like the deluded inventor, don&#8217;t we trade a comfortable illusion once in a while for an uncomfortable fact? And don&#8217;t we like to think more of ourselves than others give us credit for? Or don&#8217;t we still fear the unknown, even if it promises a great reward?</p>
<p>You see, really, all four forces are just different aspects of the same process, operating at different levels in the society. There is really only one force preventing the public availability of free energy technology, and that is the unspiritually motivated behavior of the humans. In the last analysis, free energy technology is an outward manifestation of divine abundance. It is the engine of the economy of an enlightened society, where people voluntarily behave in a respectful and civil manner toward each other, where each member of the society has everything they need, and does not covet what their neighbor has, where war and physical violence has become socially unacceptable behavior and people&#8217;s differences are at least tolerated, if not enjoyed.</p>
<p>The appearance of free energy technology in the public domain is the dawning of a truly civilized age. It is an epochal event in human history. Nobody can take credit for it. Nobody can get rich on it. Nobody can rule the world with it. It is simply, a gift from God. It forces us all to take responsibility for our own actions and for our own self-disciplined self-restraint when needed. The world as it is currently ordered, cannot have free energy technology without being totally transformed by it into something else. This civilization has reached the pinnacle of its development, because it has birthed the seeds of its own transformation. Unspiritualized humans cannot be trusted with free energy. They will only do what they have always done, which is take merciless advantage of each other, or kill each other and themselves in the process.</p>
<p>If you go back and read Ayn Rand&#8217;s Atlas Shrugged or the Club of Rome Report, it becomes obvious that the wealthiest families have understood this for decades. Their plan is to live in the world of free energy, but permanently freeze the rest of us out. But this is not new. Royalty has always considered the general population (us) to be their subjects. What is new, is that you and I can communicate with each other now better than at anytime in the past. The Internet offers us, the fourth force, an opportunity to overcome the combined efforts of the other forces preventing free energy technology from spreading.</p>
<p>The Opportunity</p>
<p>What is starting to happen is that inventors are publishing their work, instead of patenting it and keeping it secret. More and more, people are giving away information on these technologies in books, videos and websites. While there is still a great deal of useless information about free energy on the Internet, the availability of good information is rising rapidly. Check out the list of websites and other resources at the end of this article.</p>
<p>It is imperative that you begin to gather all of the information you can on real free energy systems. The reason for this is simple. The first two forces will never allow an inventor or a company to build and sell a free energy machine to you! The only way you will ever get one is if you, or a friend, build it yourself. This is exactly what thousands of people are already quietly starting to do. You may feel wholly inadequate to the task, but start gathering information now. You may be just a link in the chain of events for the benefit of others. Focus on what you can do now, not on how much there still is to be done. Small, private research groups are working out the details as you read this. Many are committed to publishing their results on the Internet.</p>
<p>All of us constitute the fourth force. If we stand up and refuse to remain ignorant and actionless, we can change the course of history. It is the aggregate of our combined action that can make a difference. Only the mass action that represents our consensus can create the world we want. The other three forces will not help us put a fuelless power plant in our basements. They will not help us be free from their manipulations. Nevertheless, free energy technology is here. It is real, and it will change everything about the way we live, work and relate to each other. In the last analysis, free energy technology obsoletes greed and the fear for survival. But like all exercises of spiritual faith, we must first manifest the generosity and trust in our own lives.</p>
<p>The source of free energy is inside of us. It is that excitement of expressing ourselves freely. It is our spiritually guided intuition expressing itself without distraction, intimidation or manipulation. It is our open-heartedness. Ideally, the free energy technologies underpin a just society where everyone has enough food, clothing, shelter, self-worth, and the leisure time to contemplate the higher spiritual meanings of life. Do we not owe it to each other to face down our fears and take action to create this future for our children&#8217;s children?</p>
<p>Free energy technology is here. It has been here for decades. Communications technology and the Internet have torn the veil of secrecy off of this remarkable fact. People all over the world are starting to build free energy devices for their own use. The bankers and the governments do not want this to happen, but cannot stop it. There will be essentially no major media coverage of what is going on. Tremendous economic instabilities and wars will be used in the near future to distract people from joining the free energy movement.</p>
<p>Western society is in many ways spiraling down toward self-destruction due to the accumulated effects of long-term greed and corruption. The general availability of free energy technology cannot stop this trend. It can only reinforce it. If, however, you have a free energy device, you may be better positioned to support the political/social/economic transition that is underway. The question is, who will ultimately control the emerging world government-the first force or the fourth force?</p>
<p>The last great war is almost upon us. The seeds are planted. After this will come the beginning of a real civilization. Some of us who refuse to fight will survive to see the dawn of the world of free energy. I challenge you to be among the ones who try.</p>
<p>LIST OF RESOURCES:<br />
Books:</p>
<p>Living Energies by Callum Coats<br />
The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity by Peter Lindemann, D.Sc.<br />
Applied Modern 20th Century Aether Science by Dr. Robert Adams<br />
Physics Without Einstein by Dr. Harold Aspden<br />
Secrets of Cold War Technology by Gerry Vassilatos<br />
The Coming Energy Revolution by Jeane Manning<br />
Websites:</p>
<p><a title="Peter Lindemann's Website" href="http://www.free-energy.cc/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.free-energy.cc/</a> developed by Clear Tech, Inc. and Dr. Peter Lindemann<br />
http://jnaudin.free.fr<a href="http://jnaudin.free.fr/" rel="nofollow">/</a> developed by JLN Labs in France<br />
http://www.keelynet.com<a href="http://www.keelynet.com/" rel="nofollow">/</a> developed by Jerry Decker in the USA<br />
http://www.xogen.ca<a href="http://www.xogen.ca/" rel="nofollow">/</a> site for super electrolysis technology<br />
http://www.fortunecity.com/greenfield/bp/16/content1.htm excellent site by Geoff Egel, Australia<br />
For links to other excellent resources: http://www.WantToKnow.info/resources#newenergy</p>
<p>Free Energy News Articles<br />
Breakthroughs in major media that should have been headline news<br />
Below are verbatim quotes taken from articles at links provided dealing with free energy</p>
<p>Kids Build Soybean-Fueled Car<br />
February 17, 2006, CBS News</p>
<p>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/17/eveningnews/main1329941.shtml</p>
<p>The star at last week&#8217;s Philadelphia Auto Show wasn&#8217;t a sports car or an economy car. It was a sports-economy car-one that combines performance and practicality under one hood. The car that buyers have been waiting decades [for] comes from an unexpected source and runs on soybean bio-diesel fuel to boot. A car that can go from zero to 60 in four seconds and get more than 50 miles to the gallon would be enough to pique any driver&#8217;s interest. So who do we have to thank for it. Ford? GM? Toyota? No-just&#8230;five kids from the auto shop program at West Philadelphia High School.</p>
<p>Iceland the First Country to Try Abandoning Gasoline<br />
January 18, 2006, ABC News</p>
<p>http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=1518556</p>
<p>Iceland has already started&#8230;turning water into fuel &#8211; hydrogen fuel. Here&#8217;s how it works: Electrodes split the water into hydrogen and oxygen molecules. Hydrogen electrons pass through a conductor that creates the current to power an electric engine. Hydrogen fuel now costs two to three times as much as gasoline, but gets up to three times the mileage of gas, making the overall cost about the same. As an added benefit, there are no carbon emissions &#8211; only water vapor.</p>
<p>Fuel&#8217;s paradise? Power source that turns physics on its head<br />
November 4, 2005, The Guardian (one of the UK&#8217;s leading newspapers)</p>
<p>http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,3605,1627424,00.html</p>
<p>It seems too good to be true: a new source of near-limitless power that costs virtually nothing, uses tiny amounts of water as its fuel and produces next to no waste. Randell Mills, a Harvard University medic who also studied electrical engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, claims to have built a prototype power source that generates up to 1,000 times more heat than conventional fuel. &#8220;We&#8217;ve got 50 independent validation reports, we&#8217;ve got 65 peer-reviewed journal articles,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We ran into this theoretical resistance and there are some vested interests here.</p>
<p>Magnetic energy? Perhaps<br />
September 7, 2005, San Francisco Chronicle</p>
<p>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/09/07/BUG9NEJD3L1.DTL</p>
<p>&#8220;All we know is that we&#8217;re seeing more energy output than input. Does Goldes realize what&#8217;s he&#8217;s saying &#8212; that he&#8217;s perhaps discovered a clean, inexhaustible energy source? &#8220;That&#8217;s exactly what it appears to be,&#8221; he answered. A handful of other companies worldwide are believed also to be pursuing zero-point energy via magnetic systems. One of them&#8230;is run by a former scientist at NASA&#8217;s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena. According to Aviation Week &amp; Space Technology magazine, the Pentagon and at least two large aerospace companies are actively researching zero-point energy as a means of propulsion.</p>
<p>Solar Challenge Finishes in Calgary<br />
July 28, 2005, Open Source Energy Network/Detroit News</p>
<p>http://pesn.com/2005/07/28/9600141_Solar_Challenge_results</p>
<p>http://www.detnews.com/2005/schools/0507/28/01-262474.htm &#8211; Detroit News<br />
http://wwmt.com/engine.pl?station=wwmt&amp;amp;id=18269&amp;amp;template=breakout_local.html &#8211; CBS affiliate</p>
<p>The ten-day solar car race from Austin to Calgary came to a successful finish yesterday. U of Michigan takes prize, finishing the 2500-mile course in 54 hours. They also set a record by averaging 46.2 mph in this, the world&#8217;s longest solar car race.</p>
<p>Eco-car more efficient than light bulb<br />
July 5, 2005, CNN</p>
<p>http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/07/04/eco.car</p>
<p>The hydrogen-powered Ech2o needs just 25 Watts &#8212; the equivalent of less than two gallons of petrol &#8212; to complete the 25,000-mile global trip, while emitting nothing more hazardous than water. But with a top speed of 30mph, the journey would take more than a month to complete. Ech2o, built by British gas firm BOC, will bid to smash the world fuel efficiency record of over 10,000 miles per gallon at the Shell Eco Marathon. The record is currently&#8230;.5,385 km/per liter [over 12,000 mpg!].</p>
<p>Advanced vehicles demonstrate zero oil-consumption, reduced emissions<br />
May 18, 2005, Boston Globe<br />
http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?section=communique&amp;newsid=8474 (article removed from Globe website)</p>
<p>Top prize for the Monte-Carlo Rally went to a modified Honda Insight [which] broke the 100-mile-per-gallon barrier over a 150-mile range. The car actually got 107 miles-per gallon. St. Mark&#8217;s High School in Southboro, and North Haven Community School, North Haven, ME, demonstrated true zero-oil consumption and true zero climate-change emissions with their modified electric Ford pick-up and Volkswagen bus.</p>
<p>Fans of GM Electric Car Fight the Crusher<br />
Washington Post, March 10, 2005</p>
<p>http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A21991-2005Mar9</p>
<p>GM agrees that the car in question, called the EV1, was a rousing feat of engineering that could go from zero to 60 miles per hour in under eight seconds with no harmful emissions. The market just wasn&#8217;t big enough, the company says, for a car that traveled 140 miles or less on a charge before you had to plug it in like a toaster. Ted Flittner, a&#8230;Costa Mesa industrial engineer&#8230;said, &#8220;they have such a brilliant solution they&#8217;ve developed. They&#8217;ve put it on the market and proved it works. People still want it and they&#8217;re taking it away and destroying it.&#8221;</p>
<p>100 MPG Car Heralded by London Times in 2002 &#8211; Where is it now?<br />
December 2 , 2004, WantToKnow.info/London Times<br />
http://www.WantToKnow.info/carmileage &#8211; WantToKnow.info (includes text of London Times article)<br />
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,588-451038,00.html &#8211; London Times</p>
<p>The Toyota Eco Spirit was the talk of the fuel economy car industry in 2002. At over 100 MPG and with the lowest exhaust emissions and a very reasonable sticker price, the Eco Spirit&#8217;s debut was widely anticipated. (see London Times article). What happened to it?</p>
<p>1908 Ford Model T: 25 MPG, 2004 EPA Average All Cars: 21 MPG<br />
Detroit News/WantToKnow.info, June 4, 2004</p>
<p>http://www.WantToKnow.info/050711carmileageaveragempg</p>
<p>Ford&#8217;s Model T, which went 25 miles on a gallon of gasoline, was more fuel efficient than the current Ford Explorer sport-utility vehicle &#8212; which manages just 16 miles per gallon.</p>
<p>Note: This last article is an excellent summary of eye-opening contradictions which have received very little media coverage, including links to major media articles to back up the facts presented.</p>
<p>Patents: This list is a sample of inventions that produce free energy. The links provided will take you directly to the patent on the website of the U.S. Patent Office. To search for patents by number on the US Patent Office website: http://patft.uspto.gov/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm<br />
Tesla USP # 685,957<br />
Freedman USP # 2,796,345<br />
Richardson USP # 4,077,001<br />
Frenette USP # 4,143,639<br />
Perkins USP # 4,424,797</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borderlandresearch.com/the-world-of-free-energy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ARCHITECTURE</title>
		<link>http://borderlandresearch.com/architecture?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=architecture</link>
		<comments>http://borderlandresearch.com/architecture#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alchemy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archetype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Athon Veggi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occult science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderlandresearch.com/architecture</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Athon Veggi Architecture is endless because &#8220;to do&#8221; Architecture is to leap into the unknown, Architecture is continuous creation within the continuity-discontinuity which is known as Universal Infinities, To be an architect is to become one with the Universal Creative Mind, one with the flux of energy that surrounds and is within the earth. In all religions and occult sciences, one of the attributes of the creative being is &#8220;the great architect&#8221;, (we find this in Catholicism, Hinduism, the &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://borderlandresearch.com/architecture">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button" share_url="http://borderlandresearch.com/architecture"></a></div><h3>by Athon Veggi</h3>
<p><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image1.png"><img style="background-image: none; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-top: 0px; border: 0pt none;" title="Golden Section Architecture" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image_thumb1.png" alt="Architecture archetype sacred occult science" width="229" height="144" align="right" border="0" /></a>Architecture is endless because &#8220;to do&#8221; Architecture is to leap into the unknown, Architecture is continuous creation within the continuity-discontinuity which is known as Universal Infinities,</p>
<p>To be an architect is to become one with the Universal Creative Mind, one with the flux of energy that surrounds and is within the earth. In all religions and occult sciences, one of the attributes of the creative being is &#8220;the great architect&#8221;, (we find this in Catholicism, Hinduism, the Egyptian religion etc,) Here then is the definition of Architectures</p>
<p>ARCH—ARCHIC—ARCHAE = ruler, first in time or rank, hence &#8220;chief, principal&#8221; and &#8220;primitive, ancient, and beginning, primary&#8221;. The Greek origin­als are: ARKHES or ARKHOS, ruler. (mon-archa = Mon-archia = ruler,} Greek ARKHE: a beginning &#8211; the first in time tend to be the &#8220;first in rank or importance&#8221; &#8211; it also tends to be &#8220;primi­tive&#8221;.</p>
<p>from ARKHAIOS (ancient or primitive) form ARCHEOLOGY: ARCHETYPE/ARKHI &#8211; Latin ARCHI = archiepiscopal and ARCHITECT,</p>
<p>TEKHNE (Greek): working with the hands,_a craft, manual skill,</p>
<p>an arte ART &#8211; Greek TEKTON, Sanscrit TAKSAN, a carpenter, builder; Latin TEXERE, tessere, hence to constructo Tegere = to cover, TELA = a web.</p>
<p>TOPOS (Greek): place</p>
<p>That which now has come to be called &#8220;architecture&#8221; is not Architecture but rather &#8220;junkatecture”. To say that Architecture is sacred or is profane is senseless because of the inherent definition of the term. From the instant that Architecture and the Cosmos are of the same essence (regardless of what name you wish to give this essence, divine, god, energy etc.) Architecture becomes knowledge (awareness) and the manifestation of the cosmic laws of proportion and harmony.</p>
<p>The term Architecture in its current use is simply an incorrect use of the term due to the extreme ignorance of contemporary culture.</p>
<p>Cosmos&#8230; Earth is within the cosmos and is part of the cosmos. The cosmos is an archetype.</p>
<p>The archetype is creation. Symbols come out of the archetype.</p>
<p><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image2.png"><img style="background-image: none; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="image" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image_thumb2.png" alt="image" width="244" height="244" align="right" border="0" /></a>If upon the earth we construct in rapport, if we construct in co­operation with the archetype, creation will be continuous* Because the earth is a living being, a highly intelligent, sentient being &#8211; and we are part of it, we belong to this organism.</p>
<p>The earth has a body like ours, with energy centres (chakras), veins, lymph system etc, and other subtle bodies invisible to the gross senses. We should thus be aware that each construction or any type of manipulation of the planet&#8217;s surface is an intrusion and a violation of the integrity of a &#8220;living being&#8221; in the highest sense of the word. Only with Architecture, therefore, is it possible to operate upon her body in a harmonic way, and without offending the laws that all of us are subject to, whether we are aware of this fact or not.</p>
<p>The Archetype, therefore, is the principle connected with the different levels of manifestation and existence, and that has in every level, a form inherent in it. Therefore it is to this form (seed of power, manifestation, essence) that we appeal in order to manifest and re-create within our own dense (gross) level, a more subtle real­ity &#8211; by the resonance of the form with said dimension.</p>
<p>The geometric, archetypal form is connected with the chakras and the physical and subtle bodies as well as with the All (the essence of the spiritual dimension)<sub>0</sub>Through this connection, transformations are stimulated from points of low-frequency energy to points of high- frequency energy.</p>
<p>Knowing how to put things together, or build, means knowing how to connect with the archetype. Mathematics, numbers, music, sounds and light are all ways of detecting the multi-faceted reality. Clearly science has not yet discovered reality, so we have to go to the source through nature, the archetype and intuition. In this manner we go to the point where the reality of Science is based. All discoveries are accomplished by tapping, with the intuition, into the realm of nature<sub>£ </sub>Science has not yet discovered itself because we must understand nature first in order to know what we must &#8220;copy”.</p>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/clip_image002.jpg"><img class="aligncenter" style="background-image: none; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-top: 0px; border: 0pt none;" title="Energy Form Transformation" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/clip_image002_thumb.jpg" alt="Energy Form Transformation" width="244" height="53" border="0" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The archetypes are related to the All — his emanations are in every system. There are infinite archetypes. Each culture tries to incorporate those archetypes most closely related to its particular range of experience. The 64 hexagrams of the I Ching, the Pythagorean table, the periodic table of the elements, are all codified arche­types that correspond to the limited, equivalent understandings of the culture that manifests them. Each energy system assumes a deter­mined form as a function of its existence, e.g. atom, molecule, DNA, galaxy etc.</p>
<p>Thus, the FORM is related to the electromagnetic field (vibration) The FORM in turn, produces the same energy as that out of which it was generated</p>
<p>FORM is condensed energy.</p>
<p>Each archetype is energy.</p>
<p>Energy is characterized by wavelength.</p>
<p>Wavelengths have their own form and shape.</p>
<p>To do Architecture is to generate Energy, to create a system, to make Instruments that by virtue of their inter and inner connectedness, are able to connect and recreate any type of effect and to connect with the cause. As above, so below.</p>
<p>Nothing is created, nothing is destroyed, everything transforms. These basic Hermetic principles are at the base of all Creative systems and at the base of what is known as Science. But when will , science find again Science?</p>
<p>The pure geometric forms, being archetypal &#8220;abstractions&#8221; (since perfect geometric forms are non-existent in nature) can receive and retransmit (manifest) sounds, colours (forms), radia­tions and realities beyond the frequency range that our five senses are capable of capturing; even if we cannot perceive them physically, they act upon our physical structure. By “physical&#8221; I mean even the bodies that are considered subtle, which is matter existing at a different velocity.</p>
<p>With Architecture we can create environments in tone with (or in frequency with, or that vibrate in frequency with) specific archetypes. Taking the appropriate materials, colours and forms we cam introduce our consensus physical reality into dimensions that normally lie outside the threshold of our normal senses.</p>
<p>All that we fabricate and construct should be done following the archetypes,, The archetypes introduce us automatically into the dimension of the eternal present, Nirvana, into that which is the end of all esoteric science and of all religions.</p>
<p>Architecture is a complex science<sub>0</sub>Architecture means connect­ion with the forms that shape the cosmos and is, in a way, a cosmogenic adventure.</p>
<p>Architecture is a complex science. The most complicated thing is simplicity. Simplicity is the sum total of everything and this sum becomes the Unity of Knowledge.</p>
<p>The science of this period does not possess the totality of knowledge and thus it lacks the appropriate measurement of the Unity of Knowledge. When science becomes Science (intuitive science, the science of the Magi, occult science) the unity of measurement will be found<sub>0</sub>I give here a method for arriving at the unity of knowledge &#8211; a method in part empiric based on the observation and study of nature. Complexity is nothing other than simplicity in a higher octave. It is a different level of consci­ousness and existence.</p>
<p>Guidelines for exercising the art of Architecture:</p>
<p>1. Because the earth is part of the cosmos. Architecture interconnects the earth, solar systems and cosmos by means of:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>a) </em>Appropriate units of measurement,</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>b) </em>Proportions (the Golden Proportion, mathematical and geometric relations).</p>
<p>2. Knowledge of the earth means knowing where and how to locate cities, buildings, green belts etc. For this task we have tools such as:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>a) </em>The grid of the earth.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>b) </em>Recognition of special sites by geographic means &#8211; Neters, gods of the sites, etc.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>c) </em>Directions</p>
<p>3. Making the appropriate form by means of:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>a) </em>Archetypes</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>b) </em>The relation between sound, form, light, colour.</p>
<p>It is essential to study and consider the geography and morphology of the site. This study includes the plants, animals and minerals of the area because the cosmic order manifests on earth in forms of the vegetable, animal and mineral kingdoms. In this way it is possible to determine which energy is dominant in the chosen area and thus be able to act appropriately.</p>
<p>I will give later a special section dealing with:</p>
<p>4. Structures: The study of plants, animals, minerals and archetypes in the light of the relationship between sound, light and forms.</p>
<p>5. The properties of the construction materials.</p>
<p>The study of nature and of natural forms is essential and science, to come into its power, must follow the guidelines of nature. *</p>
<p>The purpose of all construction is the movement of the entire oper­ation and it should be defined in complete detail with:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>a) </em>The current situation.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>b) </em>How to correct or amplify the situation in question.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>c) </em>The goal: That which one wishes to attain.</p>
<p>The example of Rome. The clearest example of the correct application of the principle of Architecture is Rome. Rome has a sacred and initiatic secret name and is founded upon a site of extreme power, (see the power grid map of the earth) where the force-field lines intersect in a powerful con­figuration. There is a river on the surface and a river below the surface (some say there exist 7 subterranean rivers.) The area in question is enclosed by 7 hills (note &#8220;The Magic of Obelisks&#8221; by Peter Tompkins). This is a cosmic symbology manifest on earth. As in Egypt, the topography suggests the very form of the constructs and the materials used, and the meaning.</p>
<p>Now, the dynamic of the mandalic manifestation unfolds in time. The nickname of the city being &#8220;the eternal&#8221; subtly implies the cross- weaving of the time/space co-ordinates.</p>
<p>Rome was founded by Etruscan priests, who possessed the know­ledge of the primordial principles in the form of a square. During the time of the Empire, square Rome was encircled by a round wall and a series of obelisks and columns raised at specific points and connected by a system of roadways. All this is nothing but a large yantra, an enormous circuit of energy,</p>
<p>Rome has always been the seat of great power, Rome is an act of magic par excellence. Passing through her streets and observing the seasons and directions means introducing oneself into a relationship with the power and correspondence between terrestrial and cosmic energy manifested there.</p>
<p>It is said din passing that in the private room of the Pope, where none other than the Pope himself is admitted (in continuation of the secret tradition of the Pontifex Maximus of the Romans) there exists a magical mandalic diagram. Is this the key to the power of the city and, for some time now, the power over the spirit­ual consciousness of a large part of the world? We remember that the last three popes, separating themselves from the tradition of power, or rather reforming that tradition, distanced themselves from the power (I refer to the POWER per se, without judging the use to which that same power is used,)</p>
<p>Rome, the eternal, founded by Etruscan priests, reveals to us her message. It is time. Relativity, It is the eternal present, (Space-time coordinates = connections with multiple realities.)</p>
<p>Both the form and the site itself generate the type of energy that we want produced, in quantity and quality. The form and the quality are mutually related. The spiral is the form that we have in the galaxy and that we find generated on earth from gravitational forces and in the movement of growth in nature. The energy gener­ated is always a dynamic energy, tending towards the absolute. The cupola being a semi-sphere, has this quality.</p>
<p>The obelisks function with the principle of involving the power points of the earth. Obelisks &#8220;direct&#8221; energy from one point to another. In Rome we observe this counterpoint of obelisks and cupolas, of spheres and points. One cannot say that these movements belong to the past because they are currently present in our reality.</p>
<p>Architecture is present. There is no past and future (I would say past, present or future) in the simple fact of existing. This is why even the definition of present, past and future is senseless, because the pyramid and the cupola ARE the Architecture in which we live N0W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borderlandresearch.com/architecture/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tesla Cosmic Ray Motor May Transmit Power &#8216;Round Earth&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://borderlandresearch.com/tesla-cosmic-ray-motor-may-transmit-power-round-earth?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tesla-cosmic-ray-motor-may-transmit-power-round-earth</link>
		<comments>http://borderlandresearch.com/tesla-cosmic-ray-motor-may-transmit-power-round-earth#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 07:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmic rays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exceed velocity of light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless transmission of power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderlandresearch.com/tesla-cosmic-ray-motor-may-transmit-power-round-earth</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tesla, on Eve of 76th Birthday, Says He Has Succeeded in Harnessing &#8216;Penetrating Rays&#8217; to Operate Small Motive Device by John J. A. O&#8217;Neill, Science Editor Brooklyn Eagle — July 10, 1932 &#8220;I have harnessed the cosmic rays and caused them to operate a motive device,&#8221; declared Nikola Tesla, famous scientist, in an interview last evening on the eve of his 76th birthday&#8230; Tesla, who all his life has worked in seclusion and struggles to avoid publicity with all the &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://borderlandresearch.com/tesla-cosmic-ray-motor-may-transmit-power-round-earth">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button" share_url="http://borderlandresearch.com/tesla-cosmic-ray-motor-may-transmit-power-round-earth"></a></div><h2 align="center">Tesla, on Eve of 76th Birthday, Says He Has Succeeded in Harnessing &#8216;Penetrating Rays&#8217; to Operate Small Motive Device</h2>
<p align="center">by John J. A. O&#8217;Neill, Science Editor<br />
<em>Brooklyn Eagle </em>— July 10, 1932</p>
<h3><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image.png"><img style="background-image: none; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-top: 0px; margin: 2px 10px; border: 0pt none;" title="Nikola Tesla" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image_thumb.png" alt="Nikola Tesla free energy superman" width="204" height="110" align="left" border="0" /></a>&#8220;I have harnessed the cosmic rays and caused them to operate a motive device,&#8221; declared Nikola <strong>Tesla</strong>, famous scientist, in an interview last evening on the eve of his 76th birthday&#8230;</h3>
<p><em>Tesla</em>, who all his life has worked in seclusion and struggles to avoid publicity with all the vigor with which movie stars court it, permits a handful of &#8220;science writers&#8221; to violate the rules as a sort of birthday party.</p>
<p>It is very much of an ordeal to the tall, straight, meticulously attired gentleman whose inventions have been epoch-making and who is unable to understand why the public should be interested in him.</p>
<p>&#8220;Cosmic ray investigation is a subject that is very close to me. I was the first to discover these rays and I naturally feel toward them as I would toward my own flesh and blood,&#8221; said Dr. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Tesla</span>.</p>
<p>His statement is borne out by reference to clippings of interviews with him more than a quarter of a century ago in which he discussed &#8220;penetrating rays&#8221; and to which not much attention was given as no one was able to comprehend the nature of them as he discussed them.</p>
<p>&#8220;I have advanced a theory of the cosmic rays and at every step of my investigations I have found it completely justified.&#8221; said Dr. Tesla.</p>
<p><strong>Not Much Power Yet</strong></p>
<p>Dr. Tesla stated that the amount of power he was able to develop in the device was insignificant.</p>
<p>I asked him if its power output was of the same magnitude as that of Crookes&#8217; radiometer, the device with four vanes in a glass tube that are rotated by sunlight, and which is often seen in jewellers&#8217; windows. He stated that the power output was many thousand times that of a Crookes&#8217; radiometer.</p>
<p>&#8220;The attractive features of the Cosmic rays is their constancy. They shower down on us throughout the whole 24 hours, and if a plant is developed to use their power it will not require devices for storing energy as would be necessary with devices using wind, tide or sunlight.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Exceed Velocity of Light</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;All of my investigations seem to point to the conclusion that they are small particles, each carrying so small a charge that we are justified in calling them neutrons. They move with great velocity, exceeding that of light.</p>
<p>&#8220;More than 25 years ago I began my efforts to harness the cosmic rays and I can now state that I have succeeded in operating a motive device by means of them.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was able to prevail upon Dr. Tesla to give me some idea of the principle upon which his cosmic ray motor works.</p>
<p>&#8220;I will tell you in the most general way,&#8221; he said. &#8220;The cosmic ray ionizes the air, setting free many charges &#8211; ions and electrons. These charges are captured in a condenser which is made to discharge through the circuit of the motor.</p>
<p><strong>Hopes to Build Large Motor</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;I have hopes of building my motor on a large scale, but circumstances have not been favorable to carrying out my plan.&#8221;</p>
<p>I asked Dr. Tesla if his plan for transmission of power between planets involved the use of cosmic rays, and he stated that the two projects have no connection whatever. He stated that he has continued his experimental work in the laboratory on the interplanetary power transmission project and is certain of its feasibility.</p>
<p>I also asked him if he is still at work on the project which he inaugurated in the &#8217;90&#8242;s of transmitting power wirelessly anywhere on earth. He is at work on it, he said, and it could be put into operation.</p>
<p><strong>Cited Two Principles</strong></p>
<p>He at that time announced two principles which could be used in this project. In one the ionizing of the upper air would make it as good a conductor of electricity as a metal.</p>
<p>In the other the power would be transmitted by creating &#8220;standing waves&#8221; in the earth by charging the earth with a giant electrical oscillator that would make the earth vibrate electrically in the same way a bell vibrates mechanically when it is struck with a hammer.</p>
<p>&#8220;I do not use the plan involving the conductivity of the upper strata of the air,&#8221; he said, &#8220;but I use the conductivity of the earth itself, and in this I need no wires to send electrical energy to any part of the globe.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borderlandresearch.com/tesla-cosmic-ray-motor-may-transmit-power-round-earth/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eidetic Geocentrism</title>
		<link>http://borderlandresearch.com/eidetic-geocentric?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=eidetic-geocentric</link>
		<comments>http://borderlandresearch.com/eidetic-geocentric#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alchemy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geocentric]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderlandresearch.com/?p=1482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eidetic Geocentrism Gerry Vassilatos CELESTA MOBILIS Quantitative inertial science has built for itself a grand theory which supposedly explains all the observed celestial movements. Modern astronomy satisfies itself by explaining that certain fundamen­tally observed celestial movements are optical perspectives resulting from earth rotation and revolution. Quantitative inertial science explains the ec­centric planetary sky courses as complex perspec­tives which result from combinations of planetary movements and earth movements. Inertial theory constructs reference frames and perspective motions in order to define celestial &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://borderlandresearch.com/eidetic-geocentric">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button" share_url="http://borderlandresearch.com/eidetic-geocentric"></a></div><h2 style="text-align: left;">Eidetic Geocentrism</h2>
<h3 style="text-align: left;">Gerry Vassilatos</h3>
<p>CELESTA MOBILIS</p>
<p><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/eidetic-geocentric/eidetic-geocentrism-1" rel="attachment wp-att-1484"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1484" title="Eidetic-Geocentrism-1" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Eidetic-Geocentrism-1.jpg" alt="Eidetic Geocentric Universe" width="333" height="353" /></a>Quantitative inertial science has built for itself a grand theory which supposedly explains all the observed celestial movements. Modern astronomy satisfies itself by explaining that certain fundamen­tally observed celestial movements are optical perspectives resulting from earth rotation and revolution.</p>
<p>Quantitative inertial science explains the ec­centric planetary sky courses as complex perspec­tives which result from combinations of planetary movements and earth movements. Inertial theory constructs reference frames and perspective motions in order to define celestial &#8220;behavior&#8221;&#8230; or &#8220;nature&#8221;.</p>
<p>Quantitative inertial science moves all the heavens and earth in order to explain observed celes­tial movements and symmetries. It sets the heavens aquiver in or­der to &#8220;explain&#8221; what sight and sense define. What inertial science has never satisfactorily explained deals with immediate experience. The question which we are asking here is best stated by children who state with incredulity:</p>
<p>&#8220;If the earth IS moving&#8230; why then do I NOT FEEL IT?&#8221;</p>
<p>We must realize that IF the earth is moving&#8230; then physical points (located on its supposed curved surface) are necessarily being DIS­PLACED with even greater rapidity as a specific spatial deviation. If this deviation is large enough&#8230; then it must be felt as a falling sensation despite gravity.</p>
<p>TERRA MOBILIS</p>
<p>If we accept all the quantitative evidences which several centuries of geodesy has accumulated then we reach a most startling revelation in several simple mathematical steps.</p>
<p>We take the equatorial earth radius, 3963.221 miles and calculate the equatorial earth circumference to be 24911.22191 miles. Earth rotational time is taken to be 23.9344694 hours per rotation. We therefore calculate that the earth rotational speed is .28913735 miles per second displace­ment at any equatorial surface point.</p>
<p>DISPLACEMENT is the essential term which we will examine here. Not to comprehend the meaning of DISPLACEMENT is to miss the central revelation of these investigations.</p>
<p>Our desired mathematical goal is to determine the actual physical displacement which a sensing organism (on the equatorial surface) experiences. We wish to clarify the maximum displacements which are possible on the (supposed) globe.</p>
<p>If such displacements are sizable then they must be subjectively (and continuously) sensed throughout the day. After all&#8230; if we are &#8220;riding&#8221; the surface of an immense ball through space&#8230; then we must feel the &#8220;shifting&#8221; or &#8220;drop&#8221; as we continuously readjust spatial position from second to second. Trigonometric determinations give us the actual &#8220;drop&#8221; every second as we (supposedly) &#8220;hurl through space&#8230; unfeel­ingly&#8221;.</p>
<p>We must first determine the actual equatorial speed which any of us SHOULD feel. I say SHOULD feel&#8230; because we are dealing with an angular displacement and not a linear velocity. Our subjective senses are extremely precise in (survivalistically) sensing all and any slight spatial displacement. While we might not be able at all to sense constant linear velocities we do sense continuous angular displacements however slight.</p>
<p>If the earth is rotating we need to know its actual speed&#8230; and recognize that this speed is one whose direction continu­ally shifts with every new second. Slight directional changes produce mild nausea&#8230; despite gravity. Gravitation never cancels out the sensations pro­duced by any angular displacement even when the two coincide (as they do on the earth&#8217;s surface)&#8230; a fact which academicians conveniently fail to address.</p>
<p>Gravitation does not neutralize the sensate spa­tial displacement on the surface of so huge a mass as the earth. Gravity focuses on the (supposed) earth center. Angular displacements focus on each tangent to the curved earth surface&#8230; an enormous thrust. The actual speed of equatorial rotation is deter­mined as .28913735 miles per second. Were we to hang a fixed pendulum in space over any specific spot we would measure it as moving away from us at little more than 1/4 mile dis­placement per second. This is no small velocity of which to speak. The point we wish to con­sider is not the constant speed of rotation through space&#8230; but the experienced DISPLACEMENT along any tangent to the surface. This is the value which triggers nerves and survivalistically protects us from &#8220;falling&#8221;.</p>
<p>The significance of this calculated value cannot be underestimated (as historically it has been). If the earth is rotating&#8230; then we SHOULD feel the displacement every second. If we are rotating then we should SENSE the speed because of the displaced &#8220;drop&#8221; across space from any point. After all&#8230; if you are facing any one particular point in space and are moving with such rapidity you should experience the very slightest physical divergence FROM that faced direction. This displacement produces a &#8220;headlong&#8221; feeling across a certain (calculated) space.</p>
<p>Earth rotates 360 degrees every day. Earth rotates .0041666 degrees every second. We examine a slice of equatorial earth and construct aright triangle. We know the hypotenuse of this triangle as the earth radius. We know the angle from earth center as 1/2 the angular rotation per second&#8230; which is .002083333 degrees per half-second. The sine of this minute angle is accurately determined to be .000036177 and is the most crucial term in our discussion. The accuracy of this constant determines the purity of all our subsequent calculations.</p>
<p>Applying the sine formula to this huge right triangle gives the value of the chord section A as .143377446 miles. Calculation reveals that the surface curvature is .144556867 miles. How curved is the surface curvature? There is a supposed 2 foot &#8220;drop&#8221; per mile tangent on the earth&#8217;s surface. We may therefore neglect the curvature across this surface section&#8230; since it amounts to .289113734 feet&#8230; less than 3 inches.</p>
<p>We then construct a second right angle triangle. We take the &#8220;across the ground&#8221; distance per second as the hypotenuse. We measure the displacement as a &#8220;drop&#8221; from that surface&#8230; to chord A. Using Pythagoras&#8217; equation, we determine the actual &#8220;drop&#8221; from curved surface to chord A as 1075.018618 feet&#8230; a staggering large value!</p>
<p>If we are displaced from our physiological center in any space at the rate of 1075 feet per second then we should all CONTINUOUSLY FEEL the displacement. But&#8230; we do NOT in fact feel any such motion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borderlandresearch.com/eidetic-geocentric/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quantum Consciousness</title>
		<link>http://borderlandresearch.com/quantum-consciousness?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quantum-consciousness</link>
		<comments>http://borderlandresearch.com/quantum-consciousness#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aether]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borderlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qabala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riley Crabb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderlandresearch.com/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quantum Consciousness &#8211; A Trap for the Unwary by Riley Hansard Crabb from the May-June 1986 Journal of Borderland Research Theoretical physicists are making continuous efforts to bridge the apparent gap between mind and matter. The Jesuit-trained French philosopher, Descartes, claimed the gap was unbridgeable and Western science has followed his lead for too long. Eastern science says there is no such gap, and has said so for thousands of years. Now, physicists like Fritjof Capra in his book &#8220;The &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://borderlandresearch.com/quantum-consciousness">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button" share_url="http://borderlandresearch.com/quantum-consciousness"></a></div><h2 style="text-align: center;">Quantum Consciousness &#8211; A Trap for the Unwary</h2>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">by Riley Hansard Crabb</h3>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>from the May-June 1986 <strong>Journal of Borderland Research</strong></em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Theoretical physicists are making continuous efforts to bridge the apparent gap between mind and matter. The Jesuit-trained French philosopher, Descartes, claimed the gap was unbridgeable and Western science has followed his lead for too long. Eastern science says there is no such gap, and has said so for thousands of years. Now, physicists like Fritjof Capra in his book &#8220;The Tao Of Physics&#8221;, are turning to the writings of Eastern philosophers to prove that Western physics has bridged the gap without knowing it! One such physicist, Fred Alan Wolf, outlines his effort in a brief article in the September 1985 issue of &#8220;Omni&#8221; magazine, &#8220;Quan­tum Consciousness&#8221;; but instead of following the lead of his teachers—East and West—and accepting the principle that mind precedes and controls matter, he reasons that matter controls mind, and the emotions.</p>
<p>In enunciating the Law of Indeterminacy years ago, the Ger­man physicist, Heisenberg, acknowledged the supremacy of mind over matter. He told his students of the 1930s that the experimenter is a part of the experiment, that his attention on it will affect the outcome. This resulted in a wave of scepticism in the scientific world then, but the recognized wave-particle duality of quantum physics confirms the German&#8217;s inspired observation.</p>
<p>Wolf poses the question: &#8220;When does an atomic object behave like a wave and when does it behave like a particle? According to many quantum physicists the answer depends on whether the object is observed. Unobserved the object appears to be spread out over space as a wave, but the instant it is observed the wave collapses to a point and behaves like a particle. The action of a simple observation &#8217;causes&#8217; a wave to collapse, producing a par­ticle. But what kind of action is a simple observation? Nobel laureates Eugene Wigner and Brian Josephson and many other physicists, including myself, believe that it may be a fundamental event beyond physics. We view it as an act of consciousness.&#8221;</p>
<p>But then he goes on to claim that the action of consciousness is controlled by the particle behavior of electrons in the brain &#8220;orchestrating the behavior of individual nerve cells as they relay their chemical messages to one another. Iargue that the wave-particle duality action of electrons, for example, could give rise to feelings of loneliness, of ego and hatred.&#8221; I argue, as a student of metaphysics, that waves of loneliness, of ego and hatred give rise to chemical changes in the molecules of the body. &#8220;Similarly,&#8221; writes Wolf, &#8220;love and feelings of compassion may be created by photons, particle-wave units of light.&#8221; It seems to me that it would be just as proper to say that feelings of compassion are waves of energy from the emotional or Astral world—what physicists call the virtual state- creating photons or particles in the physical, the actual state.</p>
<p>MIND AN OUTGROWTH OF QUANTUM PHYSICS</p>
<p>&#8220;Love and hate, success and failure, violence and peace could be but manifestations of energy, of forces and atomic objects flowing through our bodies, brains and minds as particles and waves. What we call the brain,&#8221; writes Wolf, &#8220;is the particlelike behavior of our observations. What we call mind is the wavelike behavior of atomic objects, invisible and unobserved. Mind is then the outgrowth of the basic laws of quantum physics together with the actions of the observer, which I believe are the acts of conscious­ness.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fred Alan Wolf claims to have studied the Cabala with an internationally acknowledged expert, Carlos Suares. This is while Wolf was an associate professor of physics at the University of Paris. If Suares taught him that mind is an outgrowth of matter I am surprised, and disappointed; for that philosophy is characteristic of the Left Hand Path. It is quite the opposite of another internation­ally acknowledged expert, Professor Whitehead, who held the chair for Mathematics at Cambridge. His cosmology assumed that physical events were the result of mental events, with mind, not matter, as the basis of life. John Wilcox in his excellent book &#8220;Radionics In Theory and Practice&#8221; (Herbert Jenkins, London, 1960) compares Whitehead&#8217;s positive philosophy with that of the late lamented founder of Scientology, a prize pupil of that famous or infamous Cabalist of the Left-Hand Path, Aleister Crowley.</p>
<p>&#8220;Conversely,&#8221; writes Wilcox, &#8220;Mr. L. Ron Hubbard, an Ameri­can nuclear physicist, subsequently turned his attention to psychol­ogy in the belief that mental events partake of the same fundamental characteristics as physical events. Under the name, first, of Dianetics and subsequently Scientology, Hubbard evolved a technique of psychotherapy based on the methodology of mathematics and atomic physics with which some remarkable results are said to have been obtained.&#8221;</p>
<p>One of the remarkable results was that Hubbard obtained a fortune of hundreds of millions of dollars from thousands of devotees all over the civilized world, using scurrilous business practices which made him persona non grata in many American states and in foreign countries such as England and Australia. This is one of the major reasons he made himself inaccessible to process servers by living on a yacht in the Mediterranean for years, then returning incognito back into the United States after his lieutenants had surreptitiously purchased the old Gen. Harrison hotel in Clearwater, Florida.</p>
<p>We can see here the results of particle-like behavior at work as described by physicist Wolf in the Omni article: &#8220;In the quantum world, electrons suffer a paradoxical life. Because of their particle behavior and their electrical repulsion, no two electrons can ever occupy the same space. They are doomed to solitude. In their wave-like guise, however, electrons are forever seeking their opposite par­ticle, the positron, even though such a meeting would result in their destruction. The electron&#8217;s electrical charge is a cry for the return to the void. It hopes and fears to attract its opposite, its antimatter partner, the positron, in a dance of death.&#8221;</p>
<div id="attachment_1468" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 407px"><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/quantum-consciousness/quantumconsciousnessrileycrabb-1" rel="attachment wp-att-1468"><img class="size-full wp-image-1468 " title="QuantumConsciousnessRileyCrabb-1" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/QuantumConsciousnessRileyCrabb-1.jpg" alt="Cabala, Qabala, Kabala, Kabbala" width="397" height="623" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Four Worlds of the Cabalist</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">THE RETURN TO THE VOID</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">To the Cabalist on the Right-Hand Path of love and service, the &#8220;return to the Void&#8221; is a return to the Father&#8217;s House, &#8220;O* zero is Infinity: Infinite Power, Infinite Wisdom, Infinite Love. To the Black Magician who says, &#8220;Evil, be Thou my Good&#8221;, the Void is the end, total destruc­tion because of the depen­dence on the self-limiting cycles of matter—and the inorganic beings who re­side in it, in some cases refuse from an earlier cycle, in Theosophical terms the Moon Chain, whose physical planet was Maldek. It was blown up by Evil Forces in an all-out atomic war about 700,000 years ago. Rumors of the sud­den demise of the Apostle of Quantum Conscious­ness, Ron Hubbard, were rife in Southern California long before I left it in Sep­tember 1985. In fact his oldest son went to court to get control of his father&#8217;s estate, but lost the fight to the Los Angeles leaders of Scientology, who pro­duced evidence that con­vinced the court that Ron Hubbard was still alive— though they could not pro­duce Hubbard! Now they say he is dead, of a stroke, at his California ranch, ac­cording to an Associated Press dispatch of Jan. 28, 1986, and that &#8220;Mr. Hubbard left most of his estate to Scientology&#8221;. Two other facts are known for sure. His surviving wife, Mary Sue Hubbard, is in jail for committing crimes in his name against the U.S. Government and his younger son died of mysterious causes in a Las Vegas hospital. He was found unconscious in his car, without identification, on the Nevada desert, apparently on his way to visit his older brother who was living at that time in the gambling capital. Police finally traced the ownership of the car to Clearwater, Florida and Scientology, but the staff there at first denied any knowledge of the young man who passed on, alone, and for no discernible medical cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borderlandresearch.com/quantum-consciousness/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End of Fossil Fuels</title>
		<link>http://borderlandresearch.com/fossil-fuels?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fossil-fuels</link>
		<comments>http://borderlandresearch.com/fossil-fuels#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forteana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abiogenic oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Fort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyclothems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geologic anomaly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocarbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderlandresearch.com/?p=1455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Thomas Joseph Brown &#8220;To the writers of books upon meteorites, it would be as wicked&#8211;by which we mean departure from the characters of an established species&#8211;quasi-established, of course&#8211;to say that coal has fallen from the sky, as would be to something in a barnyard, a temptation that it climb a tree and catch a bird. Domestic things in a barnyard: and how wild things from forests outside seem to them. Or the homeopathist&#8211;but we shall shovel data of coal.&#8221; &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://borderlandresearch.com/fossil-fuels">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button" share_url="http://borderlandresearch.com/fossil-fuels"></a></div><p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><strong></strong>by Thomas Joseph Brown <em></em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><em>&#8220;To the writers of books upon meteorites, it would be as wicked&#8211;by which we mean departure from the characters of an established species&#8211;quasi-established, of course&#8211;to say that coal has fallen from the sky, as would be to something in a barnyard, a temptation that it climb a tree and catch a bird. Domestic things in a barnyard: and how wild things from forests outside seem to them. Or the homeopathist&#8211;but we shall shovel data of coal.&#8221;</em></p>
<p align="right">Charles Fort, <strong>The Book of the Damned</strong> <strong></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="right"><strong>The End</strong></p>
<p>With a title like <em>The End of Fossil Fuels </em>you may think that this is an article about alternative energy or &#8220;free&#8221; energy, but alas, it is not. It is an attempt to describe the inadequacy of the term &#8220;fossil fuel&#8221; and to prevent its further usage in the English language through education in the mysteries of the hydrocarbon structures in the earth. I can&#8217;t blame people for having used this misleading phrase, being guilty myself. We are regularly taught such misconceptions in school. But one should always be ready to learn new ideas and concepts, especially once the evidence is investigated.</p>
<p>The term &#8220;fossil fuel&#8221; is a standard phrase used in reference to hydrocarbons in their various permutations as petroleum, coals, and natural gas. The argument to be presented here is that hydrocarbon deposits are not &#8220;fossilized carbon&#8221; at all in the sense implied in the modern usage of that term, that there is a larger &#8220;carbon dynamic&#8221; eventuating in the earth process. The standard response to this is &#8220;well, they FIND fossils in the deposits&#8221;. This is scientific fact and will not be disputed, fossils certainly are found in SOME deposits, many of them being quite curious&#8211;coal balls and roof balls&#8211;and will be discussed in turn as they will further our argument. There are also serious fossil anomalies, evidences of human intelligence which crop up in various coal beds supposedly laid down hundreds of millions of years before humans are supposed to have existed. But we will first look at the hydrocarbon structures themselves.</p>
<p><strong>Universal Carbon</strong></p>
<p>There is a curious picture to be gleaned by considering the diverse distribution of carbon throughout the universe. Carbon is ubiquitous, being the 4th most abundant element in the solar system, along with oxygen, hydrogen and helium. Hydrocarbons have been detected in interstellar gas clouds, in the atmospheres (as methane, CH4) of the superior planets, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and in various forms on several moons of these planets and Pluto. A significant percentage of the asteroids exhibit certain optical reflective properties of tar, as was also measured in the core of Comet Halley.</p>
<p>There is such a universal abundance of carbon that it may be reasonably considered that during the formation process of the earth vast amounts of elemental carbon were integrated into the deep earth structure, and cosmic carbon is still being deposited on earth in interplanetary dust grains. Numerous meteorites with carbonaceous content have been reported, including lumps of pure coal, though these are not prominently promoted in science, as their references are usually common rather than scientific. After all such things as extraterrestrial coal simply can&#8217;t exist, so why would a scientist bother recording it?</p>
<p>Carbon exists on earth with a dual physical nature as the hardest (diamond) and the softest (graphite) of mineral deposits. Carbon is also a fundamental ingredient of carbonate &#8220;sedimentary&#8221; rocks (limestone, chalk, graphite, dolomite, etc.), some deposits exhibiting curious and fantastic features which bring into question the normal concepts of sedimentation. Atmospheric and biospheric carbon are integral to our very structure and existence, and it is the acclaimed residue of past biospheric activity, which is the alleged source of earth&#8217;s vast and generally pure hydrocarbon deposits.</p>
<p>Carbon is everywhere permeating the earth—in &#8220;depositional&#8221; structures well studied due to the immense economic and political value of usable hydrocarbons, and as rarefied migration and transformation through much of the earth to the surface, where it slowly but constantly outgases. Hydrocarbon deposits are vast and diverse: oil, coal, natural gas, methane hydrate, etc. They appear in all geological strata from Precambrian (pre-life!) to Recent (too young for &#8220;fossil&#8221; process), and include igneous rocks (deep earth origins, allegedly no life due to heat and pressures involved), with some hydrocarbon deposits completely enclosed in basalts. Oil is also found in bubbles in crystals and geodes.</p>
<p>What could be the source of all this carbon? One current theory is that depositions are resultant from the carbon cycle in the biosphere, which imposes an incredible and curious stability on earth&#8217;s chemistry, as oxygen breathing fish are found since the early Paleozoic. Calculations of the carbon budget of the earth indicate that on average 20 kilograms of carbon have been deposited per cubic centimeter (20kg/cm2) over the age of the geological column. That is quite an astounding bit to come from purely biological processes, and the curiosities of the deposits are astonishing as well.</p>
<p><strong>Dinosaur Dung</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_1456" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 361px"><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/fossil-fuels/geographic-distribution-of-hydrocarbon-deposits-in-the-middle-east" rel="attachment wp-att-1456"><img class="size-full wp-image-1456" title="Geographic distribution of hydrocarbon deposits in the Middle East" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Geographic-distribution-of-hydrocarbon-deposits-in-the-Middle-East.gif" alt="" width="351" height="422" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Geographic distribution of hydrocarbon deposits in the Middle East. Chemical signatures specific to this region are found in all these deposits, regardless of geological &quot;age&quot; and rock type. Black dots indicate location and relative size of deposits.</p></div>
<p>If hydrocarbon deposits in the earth are not formed from distilled fossils, then what? There is an alternative viewpoint in the abiogenic&#8211;<em>non-biological&#8211;</em>theory of hydrocarbon deposits (Mendeleev, Sokoloff, Vernadsky, Kudryavtsev, Gold, and others), and that is that the carbon&#8211;a primordial earth substance&#8211;is constantly upwelling as methane from the deep earth where it was deposited during the original planetary coagulation. In this theory the primordial carbon, deposited from cosmic origin during the formation of the earth, is transformed into petroleum and coal by chemical and bacteriological action in its upward migration from depth. This abiotic theory has been well advanced in our current times by Thomas Gold, a noted and erudite scientist, but is still not provided a fair hearing in the courts of science. Gold has done extensive research, including drilling into Precambrian igneous rocks for hydrocarbons, to prove his theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borderlandresearch.com/fossil-fuels/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inducing The Urpflanze</title>
		<link>http://borderlandresearch.com/inducing-urpflanze?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=inducing-urpflanze</link>
		<comments>http://borderlandresearch.com/inducing-urpflanze#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bio-energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodynamic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmic Pipe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goethe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hieronymus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radionics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urpflanze]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borderlandresearch.com/?p=1449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Dennis Klocek In the book, Secrets of the Soil, the  author, Christopher Bird, mentions the work of T. Galen Hieronymus, the inventor of the cosmic pipe. The cosmic pipe is a 6 foot length of PVC 6&#8243; pipe filled with basalt flour with a copper wire running down the middle of the pipe. The pipe is then stood on end in the ground near a field in which a fanner wishes to grow a crop. This arrangement is said &#8230; <a class="more-link" href="http://borderlandresearch.com/inducing-urpflanze">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="right" style="float: right; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px;"><a name="fb_share" type="button" share_url="http://borderlandresearch.com/inducing-urpflanze"></a></div><p>by Dennis Klocek</p>
<div id="attachment_1452" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 364px"><a href="http://borderlandresearch.com/inducing-urpflanze/urpflanze" rel="attachment wp-att-1452"><img class="size-full wp-image-1452 " title="urpflanze" src="http://borderlandresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/urpflanze.jpg" alt="Goethe's urpflanze metamorphosis of plants" width="354" height="662" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Goethe&#39;s Urpflanze</p></div>
<p>In the book, Secrets of the Soil, the  author, Christopher Bird, mentions the work of T. Galen Hieronymus, the inventor of the cosmic pipe. The cosmic pipe is a 6 foot length of PVC 6&#8243; pipe filled with basalt flour with a copper wire running down the middle of the pipe. The pipe is then stood on end in the ground near a field in which a fanner wishes to grow a crop. This arrangement is said to vitalize plants and produce greater yields. This invention is a variation of towers, obelisks and pyramids used by agriculturists for the same purpose since ancient times. In the same book, Mr. Bird includes an interview with Harvey Lisle a bio-dynamic experimenter who has researched, among other things, the cosmic pipe. Mr. lisle did his research by dowsing and by chromatography. Mr. Lisle experimented by using a cosmic pipe to try to broadcast the Bio-Dynamic preparations. What he found was that the life force in the preparations showed strong deterioration when put inside the pipe. This was checked bychromatography. The article ended with Mr. Lisle questioning why the cosmic pipe would damp down life force when it apparently stimulated growth. This question became a burning one for this author. This paper is an attempt to take a look at the original versions of the cosmic pipe in order to try to gain insight into the problem of stimulating life in the agricultural sphere through the induction of cosmic forces.</p>
<p>Perhaps a beginning angle to explore this question would be to look at the principles of conduction, induction and capacitance in electric phenomena.</p>
<p>As I read Mr. Lisle&#8217;s comments about his experiments with the cosmic pipe, the same idea kept returning. I felt the copper wire down the center was in part responsible for the damping down of the life force. A copper wire is called paraelectric in electrical terminology because it conducts electricity, that is, it will not hold an electric charge but accepts it and allows it to move freely within the wire. Substances that are paraelectric are called conductors. Substances that do not allow electricity to pass freely are called dielectric. These substances will hold on to a charge but do not accept a charge easily so they are called insulators. Copper accepts a charge easily and passes it along. It is a conductor. Basalt is strongly dielectric. It does not accept a charge. Conductors create a flowing of energy in one direction. This flow draws energy from one place to another. This is the basic concept behind all of our electrical circuity in the modem world. Wires made of conductors carry charges from one point to another. This is fine except for the fact that in order for a conductor to work, a constant supply of force is necessary at one end. hi the modem world, we harness coal or water, sunlight or nuclear energy to keep a constant electromotive force at the ends of our conductors. In the cosmic pipe, the source of energy is the sun, the stars and the planets. Their charges are very weak but are constant. It is these weak fields which are constantly charging the biosphere with life energies according to the ideas of Rudolf Steiner. Rocks, metals, water, plants, and air are bathed in these weak fields to varying degrees. The basalt in the cosmic pipe acts, in effect, like a sponge or antennae for the weak cosmic emanations. More will be said later about the significance of the form of the cosmic pipe but its circular sides have a great significance for electric or magnetic phenomena. Why, then, did the life force not register in the B. D. preps placed within the radiations of the cosmic pipe? Perhaps the conductor drew them off at too rapid a rate, before they could build up into an energetic environment capable of enhancing the B. D. preparations which were placed inside the cosmic pipe. In order to make sense of such an assertion, it is necessary to take a look at some further concepts in the phenomena of electricity and magnetism.</p>
<p>A central concept which is connected to conduction is induction or inductance. There are many kinds of inductors in electrical studies, but at the basic level, induction simply means the transfer of a charge between two bodies when there is no direct physical contact. In the previous example of a copper wire conducting a charge, the simplest way to produce such a charge is to move the wire through the lines of force of a magnet. The magnetic lines have force in them. The wire passes through the lines and some of the force that is in the magnet is transferred or induced into the wire without the wire physically touching the magnet. As soon as the wire is out of the magnetic field, the induction ceases. If the wire is moved rapidly back and forth in the magnetic field, then the induction of its forces into the wire is increased. This is the basis for all of our electric generators and motors which produce electromotive force. As said earlier, conduction of this induced magnetic current requires unlimited supplies of energy to move the wires in a generator through the fields of a big magnet in order to produce electric power. In this system, the original force of the coal or water or sun is mostly lost as it is conducted through the wires. This is the dilemma of modem appliances which are based i on wires cutting through magnetic fields.</p>
<p>There are, however, many kinds of induction. One form of induction, electrostatic induction, can show us some basic principles by which we can move our idea one step further. Electrostatics or the study of electricity produced by friction, is an ancient way of looking at electricity. It was the primary study of men such as Benjamin Franklin, Luigi Galvani, and Allesandro Volta. The study of electrostatics involves the use of an electroscope. A simple one can be made by hanging a small piece of pith from the center of a reed, on the end of a thread. Take a piece of amber or nylon or PVC pipe and rub it with a piece of wool. Bring the rod or pipe near the pith ball and it will try to touch the end of the rod. This can be continued for a longtime until the rod no longer attracts the ball. By rubbing the rod with the wool, we have created a charge. The ball, which has no charge, is attracted to the rod because experience has shown that unlike charges attract. As the charge in the rod dissipates into the air, the rod and the ball become neutral and lose their attraction for each other. Suppose, however, that we once again charge the rod and let it attract the ball. If I place my finger on one side of the ball and then touch the ball with the charged rod, a curious thing happens. When I remove my finger, the pitch ball is now repelled by the rod. Electrostatics concludes that the rod and the ball now have the same charge. How did this happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borderlandresearch.com/inducing-urpflanze/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

